Still going to be more than the PAC and that's not arguable. Geographically the conference is worth more being on the east coast. VT, UNC, NCSU, Duke, Miami >>>>> any combination of PAC schools.
I would think that would bring in a ton of research dollars. I was under the impression that UTSA and Texas State were 3rd and 4th. But UNT, Houston and UTA are larger.
Selfishly, I want the AAC and Conference USA to raid the rest of the conference.
Good, they should not be welcomed back ever.
Gonzaga is honestly the best get the Pac could possibly hope for. Sure they don’t have football but building the best west coast conference (outside of Arizona) is very similar to trying to build the best non power football conference.
Yeah, I had forgotten about the GoR and how elitest douchebags Cal and Stanford are. They allegedly told the B12 no because of certain schools academia. (I truthfully don't know if they were even offered) So it's very doubtful they are joining a conference with Boise and Fresno. Regardless of how much better the travel is in it.
once the merger is official UTSA numbers are going to explode.. my only gripe with that place is that the astrodome is far from the actual campus
Alamodome. Yeah, not having a campus stadium sucks.
Astrodome? Yeah, that is far from the actual campus.
Ah, so they are playing in a stadium that is actual in San Antonio. Good for them. Houston is a bit far for a home game.
That young rusty cow @Thiefery has a brain fart every now and then.
i blame my damn autocorrect
They're in a conference now with SMU, so...
SMU is in the top 100 of national universities.
My comment was quite clearly about academic universities. Nothing in that mentioned religious reasons.
They are more than happy to stay at FCS. I’m also curious if the Montana and Dakota schools have any interest in moving up.
