Where are we with the CFP after week 12?

If it's Texas at 8-4 instead of Kansas State then the perception of the conference is far different.

We make don't miss two FG's against Iowa State and we have a very similar resume to Georgia heading into the last week of the season. Ifs and buts and whatnot but would you say the same thing about us?


Texas would have won with McCoy in 2009 or so but he got knocked out and they had a true freshman backup who didn't do so well. Oklahoma State got fucked in 2011 because the talking heads wanted to see a Bama LSU rematch. Bama was beating the Patriots that game so I'm not totally upset about us finishing the year no. 3 with a BCS bowl win over Andrew Luck's Stanford Cardinals but if it's us vs LSU that game we win the natty.

Also Oklahoma State was decimated by injuries early. Prior to around the Texas game we couldn't run our normal offense. I said it earlier but at WR we were stupid deep to the point where it was a question of who would get enough snaps. We were missing like 5-6 guys there plus our starting QB for Mizzou State and it got worse against Tulsa and Boise. We started getting healthier as the season progressed and right now are down one starter and a key backup lost for the season but otherwise ok. Our no 2 guy is hurt but from where we were circa Boise when we had 5 WR's travel including walk on freshman that is fine. We have a starting center out and that is a problem against a team that has recruited well on the DL but we shouldn't be a 11-1 afterthought.
No -- because you struggled with every team outside the Big 12. The fact you struggled with a FCS team, the fact you struggled with Tulsa who lost to California-Davis the week prior, the fact you barely beat Boise State. Oh yeah -- the fact you've never in the history of college football won a national title.

The fact you are trying to compare yourself to Georgia, when Georgia has been the most dominant team in all of CFB this year is laughable. And to answer your question about if you didn't miss FG's against ISU, would we feel the same about OkSt -- no. Go back to your OOC schedule and how you struggled with a FCS team and two teams with a combined record of 12-10. The Big 12 is garbage this year. You can make whatever excuses you'd like, but it doesn't change the fact.

If Ok State and Georgia were to play -- I'd wager Georgia would be a 14 or more point favorite and I'd still take Georgia to cover. Georgia's defense is filled with 1st round NFL picks. They had a guy who was projected to be a top 20 pick in the NFL draft suspended indefinitely and you can't even tell he is gone, because they have freak athletes waiting behind him.

Ok State may be a solid Big 12 team, but there are only a select few teams who have the talent to match up with Georgia right now. One of them is OSU, but it isn't Ok State, it is Ohio State. They have 1st round NFL talent at all 3 WR's spots and RB, as well as the likely Hesiman winner at QB. Bama -- they have the other Heisman Candidate at QB and NFL talent at the skill positions and OL. That about sums up the teams with a shot to beat Georgia this year. (Personally I don't think either will beat them).
 
I’m not talking the b12 up. I’m just not an sec sycophant like the rest of the world.
Again: wins vs OU, Baylor twice, and the rest… or Kentucky, auburn, Arky… and the rest.? Stop acting like UGA had the much harder road… heck even just the harder road.
My team is in the B1G. I'm also not blind though. The SEC is best conference in CFB. The only conference even close is the B1G and that's only because OSU recruits like Bama and Georgia. The Big 12 has two teams who could compete nationally, one has been a train wreck for about a decade or so and all the top recruits in their state keep signing with Ohio State, while they play musical head coaches. The other is Oklahoma, who looks lost this year, but because they have so much more talent than other Big 12 schools, they keep pulling out wins.

Also, just to point out -- not only has Georgia had the harder road, but when Ok State played a FCS team, they squeaked out a 7 point win. Georgia had a 35-0 lead in the 1st quarter and could have scored 100 points if they wanted.
 
1. Appeal masses. Textbook Logical fallacy.
2. Appeal to authority. Textbook logical fallacy.
3. You did say loss didn’t matter. But lets take your breakdown comparing losses: I agree losing to Bama is better than losing to ISU. I never disagreed.
4. Later losses do and should matter. And a loss in the CCG means you’re not a champ. That matters.
5. “I’m going to bring into our debate about which team should be ranked higher …OTHER people’s rankings.” Please tell me you see how invalid and stupid that argument is. As for the rest of this section, they play different schedules… that’s why championships and not setting up rematches matter.
6. “the problem is that conference championships isn’t relevant to the Committees principals.” … “Principals - The committee will select the teams using a process that distinguishes among otherwise comparableteams by considering:
  • Conference championships won,”
My god you’re stupid … you can’t discuss anything substantive … just throw out word salad that means nothing. You actually cited a provision that is 100% against your position, s as if it supports your nonsense. What is it with Texas fans that can’t put together a cogent thought.
 
My god you’re stupid … you can’t discuss anything substantive … just throw out word salad that means nothing. You actually cited a provision that is 100% against your position, s as if it supports your nonsense. What is it with Texas fans that can’t put together a cogent thought.
It’s not word salad. You just need to understand English and logic.

my fav is you stating that conf championships isn’t a committee principle then immediately quote that it’s the first of the listed principles.

and then trying to say that it doesn’t matter because two p5 12-1 teams are ‘not comparable.’
Lmao at you stretching ‘logic’ again. You just can’t stop yourself, can you? Lol
 
Last edited:
It’s not word salad. You just need to understand English and logic.
Dude, I’m a fucking lawyer and you remind me of some of the stupid lawyers I face that just spit shit out that doesn’t make any sense, word salad. You couldn’t put together a cogent thought if you wanted to. It’s really funny that you actually think you’re putting together an argument.

In any event, I’m done arguing with you, you’re just too stupid to stay up with the debate. Back to the kiddies table you go, we let you hang with the adults for too long. Welcome to the SEC you loser. Enjoy your seven game losing streak.
 
Dude, I’m a fucking lawyer and you remind me of some of the stupid lawyers I face that just spit shit out that doesn’t make any sense, word salad. You couldn’t put together a cogent thought if you wanted to. It’s really funny that you actually think you’re putting together an argument.

In any event, I’m done arguing with you, you’re just too stupid to stay up with the debate. Back to the kiddies table you go, we let you hang with the adults for too long. Welcome to the SEC you loser. Enjoy your seven game losing streak.
“Conf champs are not a committee principle.
Let me list the principles. Oh wait, it’s the first one listed.
But ummm that only counts if the teams are comparable. And ummm two 12-1 p5 teams aren’t ‘comparable’ cuz reasons.”
-You, the lawyer.
 
“Conf champs are not a committee principle.
Let me list the principles. Oh wait, it’s the first one listed.
But ummm that only counts if the teams are comparable. And ummm two 12-1 p5 teams aren’t ‘comparable’ cuz reasons.”
-You, the lawyer.
It’s not me that is defining these terms, it’s the committee. They’ve done it publicly for six years. It’s very clear what they have said. That term does not mean what you think it means. It’s what the committee thinks it means and what they think it means is Georgia and Oklahoma State are not comparable. If they are not comparable, then things like conference championships and strength of schedule don’t matter. As I clearly pointed out, you can disagree with that, you can think that’s a stupid way of doing things. But at the end of the day that’s exactly what they do, it’s in the rules, they’ve stated it over and over and over again. You can ignore it all you want, but that won’t change what it is.
 
No -- because you struggled with every team outside the Big 12. The fact you struggled with a FCS team, the fact you struggled with Tulsa who lost to California-Davis the week prior, the fact you barely beat Boise State. Oh yeah -- the fact you've never in the history of college football won a national title.

The fact you are trying to compare yourself to Georgia, when Georgia has been the most dominant team in all of CFB this year is laughable. And to answer your question about if you didn't miss FG's against ISU, would we feel the same about OkSt -- no. Go back to your OOC schedule and how you struggled with a FCS team and two teams with a combined record of 12-10. The Big 12 is garbage this year. You can make whatever excuses you'd like, but it doesn't change the fact.

If Ok State and Georgia were to play -- I'd wager Georgia would be a 14 or more point favorite and I'd still take Georgia to cover. Georgia's defense is filled with 1st round NFL picks. They had a guy who was projected to be a top 20 pick in the NFL draft suspended indefinitely and you can't even tell he is gone, because they have freak athletes waiting behind him.

Ok State may be a solid Big 12 team, but there are only a select few teams who have the talent to match up with Georgia right now. One of them is OSU, but it isn't Ok State, it is Ohio State. They have 1st round NFL talent at all 3 WR's spots and RB, as well as the likely Hesiman winner at QB. Bama -- they have the other Heisman Candidate at QB and NFL talent at the skill positions and OL. That about sums up the teams with a shot to beat Georgia this year. (Personally I don't think either will beat them).

Ohio State struggle with Tulsa as well. Are you shitting on them?
 
Me sitting here knowing that 12-1 Pokes and 12-1 UGA would both get in

:couch2:
You sure? Most of the world hasn't been impressed with the ACC, Big 12 or Pac 12 this entire season. They are P5 in name only. They put them in the same boat as the AAC. Champ has to be undefeated to deserve a spot in the CFP...and only then if things are wacky. Haven't you been paying attention?
 
I honestly dont think itll be all that close. Only team i can see making a game with UGA is Ohio St and im not even sold on that
Yeah, I think the only teams with a chance are ones that can score out the kazoo because I don't seeing anyone "out defensing" Georgia. The only teams in the mix that seem to be offensively good enough to do that are tOSU and Bama. JMO
 
Since we are playing a little Scenario Village, let's leave the CFP for a while and look at the rest of the New Years 6. Let's say Wisconsin shocks the world and wins out. Wins the the CCG. Does the Big 10 get 3 teams in the NEW years 6?
Danny Devito Smh GIF
 
Ohio State struggle with Tulsa as well. Are you shitting on them?

21 points compared to 5 points? Not sure if that's the hill you want to die on.

Also, Ohio State just got done beating the #7 team in the country at the time by 49 points and they could have probably beat them by 70+

It's weird to type that and it not even be an exaggeration
 
They beat them by 3 touchdowns, not 5 points.
Ohio State struggle with Tulsa as well. Are you shitting on them?

The final score of that game was not representative of how bad the Buckeyes played. The game was 27-20 with 3 min left. It was either this game or the one following that Ohio State demoted their defensive coordinator. They've gone on to absolutely steamroll just about everyone they've played since (barring PSU an Nebraska). After 3 weeks, no one was claiming Ohio State was a playoff team. They lost to Oregon and struggled vs Minny and Tulsa. Looked to me like a multiple loss rebuilding season at that point.

Okie State for the most part struggled to put anyone away through the first 7 weeks of the season and have rolled their last 4 opponents. Compared to Ohio State, they have 3 things going against them:

1. General strength of Schedule and the perception of the B12 being way down this year
2. Game control. They only really started dominating opponents in the last month when they faced the bottom of the B12 barrel.
3. Brand. Sadly, for Okie State, this is probably the most difficult one to overcome. The Buckeyes have earned the benefit of the doubt over the last few decades. The Pokes don't have that same benefit and for them to get in as a 1-loss side above a blue blood with a similar resume, they will need to remove any doubt in the minds of the voters.

All that said, a 1-loss Okie State probably does have a strong chance to get in as the #4 seed if they go on to sweep their next 2 (OU and then either Baylor or OU again in the CCG). Though it will be much closer for them to get in vs Cincy than it would be for OU. I don't think I'm breaking any news there.
 
But what we can predict is this: if it comes down to:
Pokes UGA Bama tOSU

They will definitely seed:
1 bama
2 tosu
3 uga
4 pokes
 
They beat them by 3 touchdowns, not 5 points.

21 points compared to 5 points? Not sure if that's the hill you want to die on.

Also, Ohio State just got done beating the #7 team in the country at the time by 49 points and they could have probably beat them by 70+

It's weird to type that and it not even be an exaggeration
First I agree mostly that comparing juniors schedule to Georgia or even OSU is BS.

But Let’s have some clarity with the OSU-Tulsa game here, it was a 6 point game at halftime and 7 point game in the 4th quarter. OSU got a long TD run to end the 3rd quarter and a pick 6 with under 2 minutes to play in a 14 point game as Tulsa was driving.

I agree it’s not a hill this Junior fan should be dying on but That 21 point victory was beyond deceiving. It was a 1 score game damn near the whole way.
 
You sure?
Predicting what the committee would do?! lol Idk. Most of the committee are from P5 schools and the system is rigged against G5 schools but who knows

Most of the world hasn't been impressed with the ACC, Big 12 or Pac 12 this entire season. They are P5 in name only. They put them in the same boat as the AAC. Champ has to be undefeated to deserve a spot in the CFP...and only then if things are wacky. Haven't you been paying attention?

But even if ppl is not impressed with the ACC, BIG 12, Pac-12, they still not the AAC who is 4-12 vs P5 teams this year. They just don't have the resources to compete with P5 conferences, a middle of the road ACC, BIG 12, Pac-12 still out-recruits the best AAC team. With that said Cincy is still a good/great team, maybe even top 4, it's not their fault their schedule is bad
 
Predicting what the committee would do?! lol Idk. Most of the committee are from P5 schools and the system is rigged against G5 schools but who knows



But even if ppl is not impressed with the ACC, BIG 12, Pac-12, they still not the AAC who is 4-12 vs P5 teams this year. They just don't have the resources to compete with P5 conferences, a middle of the road ACC, BIG 12, Pac-12 still out-recruits the best AAC team. With that said Cincy is still a good/great team, maybe even top 4, it's not their fault their schedule is bad
I was being sarcastic because a bunch on here have been poobahing all three conferences.
 
Back
Top