- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
- Posts
- 8,612
- Reaction score
- 6,969
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00




Foundation is solid as a rock. You are welcome to our leftovers.it's over.. AD, Bear, Brock or Gunner about to leave, this flip... foundation is cracked
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Foundation is solid as a rock. You are welcome to our leftovers.it's over.. AD, Bear, Brock or Gunner about to leave, this flip... foundation is cracked
lol it's over..even the next TE you want with the hot mom is gonna end up at UT.. u lost on duce.. it's over.. like uggaFoundation is solid as a rock. You are welcome to our leftovers.
Listen to little brother coming into the SEC mouthing off, writing checks they won't be able to cash. Can't wait for the beatdowns.lol it's over..even the next TE you want with the hot mom is gonna end up at UT.. u lost on duce.. it's over.. like ugga
big talk from a team that go whipped by us..Listen to little brother coming into the SEC mouthing off, writing checks they won't be able to cash. Can't wait for the beatdowns.
UT ruining all those other conferences, coming into the SEC with swagger only to get their dicks kicked into the dirt.
All that said, if you come in and win like Mizzou did for a few years, I'll jump off that tower in Austin.
Big talk from B2B NCs is what you meant to say.big talk from a team that go whipped by us..
You don't like 4* Safety's?geez this thread has been dead.. I'd post the recent ou gets but they all suck
![]()
Hevin Brown-Shuler, Pace Academy , Defensive Line
![]()
Charleston Collins, Wilbur D. Mills , Defensive Line
You don't like 4* Safety's?
Bill Bedenbaugh is on the board for the 2024 Recruiting Class as he led the charge and helped Oklahoma land its first offensive line commitment for the class of the cycle. Three-star offensive tackle Isaiah Autry chose Oklahoma over Ole Miss, Alabama, Florida State, and Auburn.
He is still crystalled balled to OU. But so is Jeremy Payne, Stacey Gage, and Tovani Mizell. Can't take them all.y'all land thieves still stand with Demarco Murray?
![]()
homers drumm and thune can't be trusted on.. hell one of them a week ago was blowing smoke that Bear had interest transferring to ou too lolHe is still crystalled balled to OU. But so is Jeremy Payne, Stacey Gage, and Tovani Mizell. Can't take them all.
Drumm is a tool but Parker Thune knows his stuff.homers drumm and thune can't be trusted on.. hell one of them a week ago was blowing smoke that Bear had interest transferring to ou too lol
Oops.
Averages are a decent metric, except they don't weigh players at all. So the last 4 star recruit is treated the same as the first 4 star recruit in the top 100 after the 5 stars stop. And there's even more of a difference between the first 3 star out and the last 3 star before the two stars/no ranking players start. Averages can also really be deceiving by class size. USC only has two recruits, so they have a decent average. But only having two recruits right now isn't great.Meh ... it's the average you look at this time of year.
1. Bama
2. UF (I know, WTF?)
3. UGA
4. tOSU
5. USCjr
6. UM
7. ND
8. Ore
Even then, it's way early.
Averages are a decent metric, except they don't weigh players at all. So the last 4 star recruit is treated the same as the first 4 star recruit in the top 100 after the 5 stars stop. And there's even more of a difference between the first 3 star out and the last 3 star before the two stars/no ranking players start. Averages can also really be deceiving by class size. USC only has two recruits, so they have a decent average. But only having two recruits right now isn't great.
You are very much correct. Without looking closely enough I just assumed it was average star ranking, which is (at least I think?) at thing they used to list. But it is, as you said, the average of the number the associate with that particular recruit.Everything you said except the last sentence is wrong.
Ohio State has a four star that has a .9641 ranking (just below a five star) and another that is a .8981 ranking (just above a 3 star). The average absolute takes that into account
They don't just add up the number of stars and divide by number of recruits
Averages are a decent metric, except they don't weigh players at all. So the last 4 star recruit is treated the same as the first 4 star recruit in the top 100 after the 5 stars stop. And there's even more of a difference between the first 3 star out and the last 3 star before the two stars/no ranking players start. Averages can also really be deceiving by class size. USC only has two recruits, so they have a decent average. But only having two recruits right now isn't great.
Everything you said except the last sentence is wrong.
Ohio State has a four star that has a .9641 ranking (just below a five star) and another that is a .8981 ranking (just above a 3 star). The average absolute takes that into account
They don't just add up the number of stars and divide by number of recruits
This is the problem that a Florida poster had here last year ... he was bragging about them having the top star average. I told him that didn't mean anything and he trolled on and on that it did. He should be in here now, because they actually have a good average when looking at the rating, not the stars.You are very much correct. Without looking closely enough I just assumed it was average star ranking, which is (at least I think?) at thing they used to list. But it is, as you said, the average of the number the associate with that particular recruit.