Poll Bears 2024 qb

Who will be Bears next qb

  • Caleb Williams

    Votes: 13 36.1%

  • Drake Maye

    Votes: 1 2.8%

  • JJ McCarty

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Michael Penix

    Votes: 2 5.6%

  • Jayden Daniels

    Votes: 1 2.8%

  • Justin Fields

    Votes: 14 38.9%

  • Kburjr,Nos annd Mofo put ketchup on potato salad

    Votes: 5 13.9%

  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    36
Wild Turkey said:
This guy is going to be a bust. Even if he is talented on the field he will be a cancer in the locker room. Kyle Murray on steroids.
Click to expand...

Sure seems like it.

Doesn’t seem to have that extra edge to him in the mental toughness area.
 
RobBase said:
Any predictions on what team he will allow to draft him?

Raiders with Cliff Kingsbury at OC maybe?
Click to expand...
Kingsbury and Pierce might be the perfect duo to handle him. Kingsbury is a talented coordinator and Pierce is a tough coach that the entire team respects. If he goes to Chicago, it'll be a disaster.
 
Across The Field said:
Kingsbury and Pierce might be the perfect duo to handle him. Kingsbury is a talented coordinator and Pierce is a tough coach that the entire team respects. If he goes to Chicago, it'll be a disaster.
Click to expand...
False

Chicago needs CW in a bad way.
 
Handicappers said:
False

Chicago needs CW in a bad way.
Click to expand...

If he refuses to play there what can they do?

Do they still trade Fields and draft a different QB? Trade Fields AND trade the pick for an absolute haul?
 
Mofo said:
This seems like a good strategy, until you realize that there are only ever about 2-6 "elite" QBs playing in the NFL and maybe 10 so-so guys. Everyone else is either hoping for that elite guy or planning to draft high in the next season.

Eventually GMs will realize that you can build good offenses around passable QBs and rely on defense to keep you in games. You can do a lot on a roster if you pay 1-2 guys like Baker Mayfield / Ryan Fitzpatrick / Brock Purdy / Kenny Pickett. Throwing Mahomes money at Dak Prescott is just a waste. Even worse is always selecting Akili Smith or Johnny Football, based on hype and fear of missing out. Caleb Williams isn't a 100% bust, but there are some warning signs.
Click to expand...

Doesn't that lend more importance towards drafting more QBs?
 
Tharvot said:
Doesn't that lend more importance towards drafting more QBs?
Click to expand...
Sort of a catch-22. If you draft more QBs, you have a higher likelihood of one of them working out in theory. At the same time, the issue might be with your coaching and development, and it doesn't matter which QB you draft, you aren't going to develop any of them (current and, basically eternal, situation in Chicago). At the same time, you've drafted those QBs instead of addressing other needs, and now those needs still exist while you have a roster of QBs that aren't contributing.
 
RobBase said:
Oh boy.

Click to expand...


Thats old hat......When Williams came out and said that was a few months ago.....Have not heard a thing about it since,same as whoever drafts him,he wants part ownership.......

RobBase said:
If he refuses to play there what can they do?

Do they still trade Fields and draft a different QB? Trade Fields AND trade the pick for an absolute haul?
Click to expand...

When the Bears do their due diligence of interviewing him,it will come out then what is view is about coming to Chicago........

Now,it seems like Im lobbying for CW,but Im really not.......if thats who the Bears decide thats who they want,great.....if they decide they want Maye,great........or to keep JF,great.......

Bears are in a great place

I think the North division Maye want us to take a qb instead of all the draft capital......Atleast thats only one person to contend with rather than more..........
 
Across The Field said:
You blamed him for the loss against Denver, a game where he had 335 yards passing, and 80% comp and 4 TDs. It's clear no matter what he does, you're going to blame him for shit that isn't his fault.
Click to expand...
Oh you mean the game where every positive stat he had occurred in the first half, while doing nothing but turn it over in the second half? The one where he took a wildly stupid fucking sack and fumbled it, where it was returned for a TD, and then the next drive, threw a fucking pick? That Denver game?

Ya dude, he had nothing to do with that loss at all. Gag me.
 
But, it WAS the only fucking game he threw for over 300 yards in his entire career, so there IS that.:rolleyes2:
 
Talk about testament to stats not always telling the whole truth.
 
beardown07 said:
Oh you mean the game where every positive stat he had occurred in the first half, while doing nothing but turn it over in the second half? The one where he took a wildly stupid fucking sack and fumbled it, where it was returned for a TD, and then the next drive, threw a fucking pick? That Denver game?

Ya dude, he had nothing to do with that loss at all. Gag me.
Click to expand...
LOL what difference which half it all happened in?? That's your argument?? He built up a 28-7 second half lead and the defense fucking collapsed. Also I have no doubt you didn't watch that game if you blame the fumble on him. It was play-action with an untouched blitz from the outside. The second he turned around the guy was in his face. You're being incredibly obtuse, and that's putting it nicely.
 
beardown07 said:
Talk about testament to stats not always telling the whole truth.
Click to expand...
You mean like the Browns game where he had 166 yards, 1 TD and 2 INTs where if it wasn't for incompetent receivers he would've had almost 300 yards, 3 TDs, and 1 INT (which was a hail mary at the end of the first half)?
 
Across The Field said:
LOL what difference which half it all happened in?? That's your argument?? He built up a 28-7 second half lead and the defense fucking collapsed. Also I have no doubt you didn't watch that game if you blame the fumble on him. It was play-action with an untouched blitz from the outside. The second he turned around the guy was in his face. You're being incredibly obtuse, and that's putting it nicely.
Click to expand...
You should ask Detroit what difference it makes. The game is 60 minutes, not 30.

The fumble was a blown play that he failed to protect the ball. He should have just taken the sack. He tried to do too much and fumbled it. Broken play or not, he had time to TRY to throw it, he had time to tuck it and live to fight another day. That fumble is solely on him. Get the fuck out of here with that shit.


You are wildly blinded by your Ohio St. fanhood.
 
beardown07 said:
You should ask Detroit what difference it makes. The game is 60 minutes, not 30.

The fumble was a blown play that he failed to protect the ball. He should have just taken the sack. He tried to do too much and fumbled it. Broken play or not, he had time to TRY to throw it, he had time to tuck it and live to fight another day. That fumble is solely on him. Get the fuck out of here with that shit.


You are wildly blinded by your Ohio St. fanhood.
Click to expand...
LOL Fields gave the defense enough points for an entire 60 minute game. Was he supposed to put up 56 to ensure the defense doesn't fuck it all up or something??

Again, you didn't watch that play. Not sure it was a broken play but it was definitely a blown assignment, the blitzer was literally untouched. He had 0 time to make any kind of throw. The fumble is <1% on him.

My Ohio State fanhood aside, he's the most talented QB the Bears have had in ages. Do me a favor - name one QB who, in his first 3 years in the league, had complete trash coaching/coaching turnover and (for the majority of the time) a trash OL and trash weapons and actually looked great.
 
packerzrule said:
LOL at anyone defending Justin Fields.
Click to expand...
Fields may end up not being good. He might be a backup or gadget QB. The point is, you can't make that assertion based on the shit he's had to deal with in Chicago. No QB in their first 3 years was coming in dealing with that mess and looking great.
 
Across The Field said:
You mean like the Browns game where he had 166 yards, 1 TD and 2 INTs where if it wasn't for incompetent receivers he would've had almost 300 yards, 3 TDs, and 1 INT (which was a hail mary at the end of the first half)?
Click to expand...
Oh, you are talking the game where, the Defense got three INTs, including a pick six and one returned to the 1 yard line, where the Offense subsequently took 6 plays to get a TD?

The one where they drove 61 yards after Tyrique Stevenson's INT, only to shit the bed on 4th and 1, with the stupidest sack ever?

The game where they decided to throw deep to the 2nd Tight End, who had all of 3 targets all season, leading up to that point, and he dropped it, early in the 1st quarter?


That game? That's your cherry-picked game? That's your argument?

But ya, there were a couple of drops.:rolleyes2:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top