Cool, it was meant to cut the shit about him being absolved from any blame. It was meant to disagree with the post that he just needs more around him. I disagree with that. I don't think that's his problem at all. I think the Bears fielded a team this year that was good enough to win. I think one of the weakest links on the team, happens to play the most important position, QB. Currently, he is not a good QB. He's a good football player, a tremendous athlete, and a nice kid. But he is not a good QB.
So ya, when you start spouting off about Denver and Cleveland, I pointed out the context and nuance that you deliberately ignore. Yes, he played a huge part in both of those losses. That is undeniable. From second half failures and untimely turnovers in the Denver game, to the D setting him up huge and him doing nothing with it in Cleveland.
Does that mean there weren't other factors? Of course not. As stated, it's all connected tho. There are ripples from every negative play.
We are 3 years in, and he is still lackadaisical in his drop back, he is still prone to ditch after the first read, he still has an awful windup, he is still habitually late on throws, he still struggles with accuracy, particularly with in routes, he still shrivels when it matters most, and he still only plays well against shitty teams, (save for Detroit).
I like the kid, but if the Bears pass on the number 1 for the second straight year, and next year at this time we are still having this conversation, the city of Chicago will burn.
I just don't see enough to warrant that. I'll support him the best I can, if that's the case, but I have my doubts, that he'll ever be much more than he is right now, which is not good enough.