- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
- Posts
- 8,603
- Reaction score
- 6,965
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00




What's funny is that you actually don't understand what the articles you posting mean when they use Internal Affairs and are truly too stupid to realize that.pshhh..... You don't even know what 'Internal Affairs' are.
One thing's for certain.... I wouldn't want your fraudulent ass representing me if a Delaware corporation's truck hit me in Nebraska.
I've told this story before, but it applies to your dumb ass. I was defending a case against a pro se plaintiff, and he brought some motion where he cobbled together a bunch of words that sounded important, but at the end of the day made no sense. I wrote a reply brief that simply said something like, "We have attempted to understand what the Plaintiff's motion is, but are not capable of understanding or replying to it. There are no cogent points being made, and we have no idea what relief is being sought." At the hearing, he got up and said a lot of legal words that together made no sense. When he say down, the judge looked to me and I stood up, shrugged my shoulders and said, "your honor, I have nothing. I have no idea what he just said. But I will state for the record that whatever he said, we adamantly oppose it. Thank you." The judge and everyone else in the courtroom laughed. She then looked over at the poor fool and said, "motion denied, next case."
Truly, that moron could have been you. You are saying all sorts of fancy words that together don't express a single cogent idea. Put down the knife WebAttorney, you are so far in over your head you are drowning.