Colorado to the Big 12?

gobigred said:
Number of MWC Championship doesn’t matter. It’s about the value that they add and none of those add much value. Is PAC really gonna pay $30 million buyout to get out schools that add less value than that ? With how awful the PAC is run they might actually LMAO
Click to expand...
This. The only team that can add enough value as to not reduce the per school share to either the B1G or SEC is Notre Dame. They are the only real "marquee" school left. FSU and Clem MIGHT bring close to the per share value. But, the closer it gets to 100 Million per school the less likely it is that even those two can bring that much.
 
OlyDuck said:
1. Texas was the problem and the LHN
2. Scott
3. USC put a stop to that
4. could have didnt need to then.
Click to expand...
LOL Texas was never the problem.. hell they were onboard even when aggy backed off to go to the SEC instead.. When ESPN threw 300 million at UT for 3rd tier rights.. Pac should have allowed them to bring it.. Having UT would have made all the cable/satellite companies carry the PAC network from day 1

They also messed up in 1990 by not adding UT and aggy too.. all thanks to Stanford.

2. Scott did mess things up.. but I get why.. I don't think he understood how little football meant to people on the west coast. Schools controlled their RSN channels.. people just didn't want them at the end of the day.

3. SC/UCLA didn't want to expand.. but the PAC should have anyways.. and instead were always steps behind the Big12 for stability
 
Thiefery said:
LOL Texas was never the problem.. hell they were onboard even when aggy backed off to go to the SEC instead.. When ESPN threw 300 million at UT for 3rd tier rights.. Pac should have allowed them to bring it.. Having UT would have made all the cable/satellite companies carry the PAC network from day 1

They also messed up in 1990 by not adding UT and aggy too.. all thanks to Stanford.

2. Scott did mess things up.. but I get why.. I don't think he understood how little football meant to people on the west coast. Schools controlled their RSN channels.. people just didn't want them at the end of the day.

3. SC/UCLA didn't want to expand.. but the PAC should have anyways.. and instead were always steps behind the Big12 for stability
Click to expand...
Texas was the problem.
 
Wild Turkey said:
Texas was the problem.
Click to expand...
Texas is never the problem.. Pac 12 failed because it didn't listen to UT.. Big12 survived because the 8 other schools not named UT or ou got more money than they ever had with UT having LHN... enough so that they all upgraded it's stadiums and facilities... more than what CU did when they left to the PAC
 
Wild Turkey said:
Texas was the problem.
Click to expand...

tejas has always been the problem.

They're the SEC's problem now. :dhd:

Can't wait to watch this play out.

EasyEveryChrysalis-max-1mb.gif
 
Texas wasn't the problem. That's absurd. Anyone that thinks so obviously doesn't know shit about this topic.
 
Colorado crushing Nebraska that one year in Boulder is the only game I remember Brasky losing to them in 90's/early 00's. (Yes yes, I know CU beat them recently)
 
ralphiewvu said:
Colorado crushing Nebraska that one year in Boulder is the only game I remember Brasky losing to them in 90's/early 00's. (Yes yes, I know CU beat them recently)
Click to expand...
2 game winning streak
 
Thiefery said:
lol i still think of the Big8 when it comes to Colorado
Click to expand...
Handicappers said:
Didn't they used to play Nebraska every year on day after Thanksgiving?
Click to expand...

Not when they were Big 8.

In the Big 8 Nebraska/Oklahoma was the day of/or day after Thanksgiving.

Only when the Big 12 was formed did Colorado/Nebraska become a thing day after Thanksgiving.
 
Deep Creek said:
Picking on the afflicted shouldn't count. Kind of like Maryland's 2 game winning streak against you guys. :beer2:
Click to expand...
being swept by MD was bad.. but they weren't a rival either
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top