Dunce Q: Place ball when out of bounds?

Bayou Tiger said:
So if you saw someone record it wrong now the rules have changed for everyone else from now on???

WOW! I did not know that!
Click to expand...
Many multiple times.
Again, why would runners try to place the ball inside the pylon if the goal line was “infinite”?
 
ELTEXAN said:
If it was as simple as you describe, you’d never see runners try to extend the ball inside the pylon. So simply, you’re wrong.
Click to expand...
You are not reading what I said...on purpose apparently.

You are trying to decide the outcome of the play before the actual play is over. If the player crosses the goal line with the ball in the air and none of his body touching any part of the "inbounds" before he lands "out of bounds)..then yeah dumbass, he didn't score. Like I said, and you ignored, the player must be inbounds at the time the play ends. If he is recorded at any point out of bounds then the play is over at that spot.
What part of that is too complicated for you to comprehend? Tell me and I'll re-type it slower so maybe you'll get it this time!
 
ELTEXAN said:
In the scenario, the ball is at the 46 when he finally touches out of bounds. So you’re either now contradicting yourself or typo???
Click to expand...

What are you stupid or something?

When a runner gets the ball on the 10, carries it to the 15, then gets pushed back to the 13 where do they spot the ball?


Where his forward progress ended. Not where the player ended up once the whistle blew.
 
Bayou Tiger said:
You are not reading what I said...on purpose apparently.

You are trying to decide the outcome of the play before the actual play is over. If the player crosses the goal line with the ball in the air and none of his body touching any part of the "inbounds" before he lands "out of bounds)..then yeah dumbass, he didn't score. Like I said, and you ignored, the player must be inbounds at the time the play ends. If he is recorded at any point out of bounds then the play is over at that spot.
What part of that is too complicated for you to comprehend? Tell me and I'll re-type it slower so maybe you'll get it this time!
Click to expand...
You are literally so stupid you’re not seeing the ambiguities in your own statement, and also not responding to the thread.
Again.
You have both feet on the 50 yard line inbounds barely.
You dive at a 45° angle out of bounds in the air forward
the ball crosses over the plane of out of bounds at the 49 slightly ahead of you.
The ball is at the 46 (out of bounds) when your elbow (or foot) finally touches on the ground out of bounds.
You’re the ref.
Do you spot the ball at 49 or 46?
 
Bayou Tiger said:
What are you stupid or something?

When a runner gets the ball on the 10, carries it to the 15, then gets pushed back to the 13 where do they spot the ball?


Where his forward progress ended. Not where the player ended up once the whistle blew.
Click to expand...
In my scenario, it’s all moving forward. I now see where YOU are making a bad assumption
 
ELTEXAN said:
Many multiple times.
Again, why would runners try to place the ball inside the pylon if the goal line was “infinite”?
Click to expand...

Got damn you ARE stupid! They do that only when they realize they will end up touching out of bounds before they cross so they extend the ball across the "endzone" to record a TD before their body touches out of bounds causing the play to end without a TD. Again....the player has to be inbounds, not the ball.
 
You all can stop arguing. I literally quoted the rule.
 
Bayou Tiger said:
Got damn you ARE stupid! They do that only when they realize they will end up touching out of bounds before they cross so they extend the ball across the "endzone" to record a TD before their body touches out of bounds causing the play to end without a TD. Again....the player has to be inbounds, not the ball.
Click to expand...
Nope. They do that all the time. Even when extending it past the infinity line would be much easier.
It makes no sense to add the extra factor of trying to get it inside the pylon if outside the pylon is just as good. You’re now just lying
 
ELTEXAN said:
In my scenario, I'm always right no matter how stupid my argument is.
Click to expand...

No wonder why your "every tackle leads with the head" thread is so long. You can't fix stupid. I'm out.
Argue with yourself moron, I'm tired of your stupidity....
 
jjc2009 said:
You all can stop arguing. I literally quoted the rule.
Click to expand...
It seems the rules are different for the goal line.
so to answer the scenarios.
it’d be at the 46.
but not a TD.
AGAIN , this adamant dunce is wrong
 
ELTEXAN said:
So you’re just not responding to the point of this thread. Ok.
well, then, can we have your answer to this actual thread scenario?

AGAIN:
Scenario: player is rushing forward and toward the sideline. He jumps from the 50 yard line extending the ball forward and away from his body. The ball crosses over the out of bounds line at the 49. He keeps extending the ball forward. When his foot finally actually lands Out of bounds, the ball is at the 46.

Where should the referee place the ball? The 49 or the 46?
Click to expand...

I was right, again. You were wrong, as usual...


1638747161633.png
 
Bayou Tiger said:
No wonder why your "every tackle leads with the head" thread is so long. You can't fix stupid. I'm out.
Argue with yourself moron, I'm tired of your stupidity....
Click to expand...
Yeah I’d run too if my idiocy was called out.
 
ELTEXAN said:
It seems the rules are different for the goal line.
so to answer the scenarios.
it’d be at the 46.
but not a TD.
AGAIN , this adamant dunce is wrong
Click to expand...
It’s spelled out in the rule. It would be 49 and not a TD.
 
If you dive from the four. Ball crosses over to out of bounds at the two. Then the ball lands out of bounds past the infinity goal line out of bounds. It is NOT a TD

You. We’re. Wrong.
 
ELTEXAN said:
Yeah I’d run too if my idiocy was called out.
Click to expand...

I just posted the rule that agrees with exactly what I said moron. You lose again retard!
 
jjc2009 said:
It’s spelled out in the rule. It would be 49 and not a TD.
Click to expand...
No. The rule looks to say it’s the 46, ahead of the 49
 
Bayou Tiger said:
I just posted the rule that agrees with exactly what I said moron. You lose again retard!
Click to expand...
Again. There are exceptions for the goal line. Dunce. Literally from the thing you copy pasted
 
ELTEXAN said:
Did you miss the exceptions for the goal line? You were decidedly wrong
Click to expand...
We weren't talking about the goal line just then asshole...we were discussing the 49 and 46 yard line. Decide which point you want to be wrong about and we will address them separately dummy. You are trying to argue two points and are wrong on both.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top