Michigan’s Sherone Moore to be named head coach

Literally bawling and swearing on national TV about a coach being punished for cheating is the definition of soft. I bet his wife gives him a bedtime.
Michigan wasn't punished for cheating. But what is soft is Ryan day trying to attack Michigan through the B10 and failing. Which leads to our leaders crying on national TV when the unjust attacks were revenged.
 
Who is calling Chip Kelly's offense soft? I couldn't even tell you what type of offense the guy is even running anymore. He has failed at pretty much every spot he has went to as a HC since leaving Oregon. His style of offense works in college though. I'd much rather Ryan Day be calling plays.

Hiring Chip Kelly was one of the best moves OAM made this offseason.

@MAIZEandBLUE09 is.
 
Thank you for proving you know nothing about football. McCord was well-known for forcing throws (his first half gift-wrapped INT got michigan a freebie TD this year), and his touch was horrendous. He was bailed out numerous times by his WRs. He also is a statue. Please stop using the word "excuses" when you can't even get simple facts straight.
There are those excuses. Let me guess -- Howard's below 60% completion rate are his receivers fault. So is the higher interception rate.

LOVE THE EXCUSES. McCord didn't have touch (completed 66% of his passes. McCord forced his passes (He threw half the amount of Int's as Howard). His touch is horrendous. (McCord threw for 500 more yards while throwing the ball less than Howard)

Give us more excuses. They are highly entertaining.
 
Having a good offense doesn't mean you're not soft. Ohio State had a good offense the last 3 years, they were soft. And Kelly's finesse style is absolutely soft.

Do you know why they had a good offense? It wasn't because they were throwing it all over the field. Sheesh man. You're totally wrong on this one. There is no statistical measurement that backs up your opinion. None.
 

If you can stop the inside zone read and the Y crossing route, you've beat soft chip kelly.

Didn't happen in 2021 or 2022. They were an elite rushing team both years. And even though they weren't as successful last year, they were still a run first team. You're just wrong man.
 
Do you know why they had a good offense? It wasn't because they were throwing it all over the field. Sheesh man. You're totally wrong on this one. There is no statistical measurement that backs up your opinion. None.
Chip Kelly's offenses at Oregon didn't throw it all over the field? They ran the read option offense, which was almost entirely a rushing offense. Are you confused here? Oregon was soft then, UCLA is soft now and Ohio State will remain soft under the guy who runs a soft offense (and has since Oregon). It's basic, easily fools bad teams and good teams eat it for breakfast. I don't think Oregon had a top passing offense ever under Kelly (and by top I mean top 30).
 
Michigan wasn't punished for cheating. But what is soft is Ryan day trying to attack Michigan through the B10 and failing. Which leads to our leaders crying on national TV when the unjust attacks were revenged.
Oh they absolutely were. Multiple coaches fired, HC was suspended, possibly more to come. Now lying about Ryan Day trying to attack michigan and making up internet rumors? Man you guys crumbled fast.
 
Oh and @ericd7633 UCLA hasn't had a top 30 passing offense, most have been 60+, since before the year he was hired (2017). They run a soft read option, which is exactly my point here.
 
Oh they absolutely were. Multiple coaches fired, HC was suspended, possibly more to come. Now lying about Ryan Day trying to attack michigan and making up internet rumors? Man you guys crumbled fast.
Multiple coaches weren't fired. An analyst was fired for going behind the actual coaching staff, and one coach was fired for talking to players about the NCAA investigation. So far not a single coach has been fired for scouting activities. The HC was suspended by the B10 because Ryan day cried about sportsmanship.
 
There are those excuses. Let me guess -- Howard's below 60% completion rate are his receivers fault. So is the higher interception rate.

LOVE THE EXCUSES. McCord didn't have touch (completed 66% of his passes. McCord forced his passes (He threw half the amount of Int's as Howard). His touch is horrendous. (McCord threw for 500 more yards while throwing the ball less than Howard)

Give us more excuses. They are highly entertaining.
I can't help you learn football. You really know nothing. Thankfully that has no impact on OSU's success. Howard may not be a Heisman winner, but our offense will run much better with him at QB. Just a simple fact that everyone but you understands.
 
Multiple coaches weren't fired. An analyst was fired for going behind the actual coaching staff, and one coach was fired for talking to players about the NCAA investigation. So far not a single coach has been fired for scouting activities. The HC was suspended by the B10 because Ryan day cried about sportsmanship.
Holy hell, this entire post is literally a lie LOL. Like every single thing in it is completely made up. Between you falling completely apart and newphone refusing to stop sucking McCord's dick, this has been a real rough offseason for you guys already.
 
Chip Kelly's offenses at Oregon didn't throw it all over the field? They ran the read option offense, which was almost entirely a rushing offense. Are you confused here? Oregon was soft then, UCLA is soft now and Ohio State will remain soft under the guy who runs a soft offense (and has since Oregon). It's basic, easily fools bad teams and good teams eat it for breakfast. I don't think Oregon had a top passing offense ever under Kelly (and by top I mean top 30).

No, that seems to be you here. UCLA wasn't a soft team. Please provide ONE example of why you think that. I've given you about 5 stats to back up my opinion on why I don't think they were soft. They were an elite rushing team in 2021 and 2022(lead the country in rushing ypc). Did you watch any UCLA games in the last 3 seasons? I can't think that you have.
 
Chip Kelly's offenses at Oregon didn't throw it all over the field? They ran the read option offense, which was almost entirely a rushing offense. Are you confused here? Oregon was soft then, UCLA is soft now and Ohio State will remain soft under the guy who runs a soft offense (and has since Oregon). It's basic, easily fools bad teams and good teams eat it for breakfast. I don't think Oregon had a top passing offense ever under Kelly (and by top I mean top 30).
When OSU has an even easier time moving the ball all over michigan's slow defense this year, what will be the reason for it?
 
No, that seems to be you here. UCLA wasn't a soft team. Please provide ONE example of why you think that. I've given you about 5 stats to back up my opinion on why I don't think they were soft. They were an elite rushing team in 2021 and 2022(lead the country in rushing ypc). Did you watch any UCLA games in the last 3 seasons? I can't think that you have.
You're going down a rabbit hole of nonsense. michigan had 156 yards rushing on 4.0 ypc last year against OSU and they think that's a dominant performance in the trenches but think Chip Kelly's offense is soft.
 
Oh and @ericd7633 UCLA hasn't had a top 30 passing offense, most have been 60+, since before the year he was hired (2017). They run a soft read option, which is exactly my point here.

But it's not. They were a physical rushing attack.
 
No, that seems to be you here. UCLA wasn't a soft team. Please provide ONE example of why you think that. I've given you about 5 stats to back up my opinion on why I don't think they were soft. They were an elite rushing team in 2021 and 2022(lead the country in rushing ypc). Did you watch any UCLA games in the last 3 seasons? I can't think that you have.
Again, it's a soft offense. That's why it wins nothing. That's why Oregon's trophy shelf is empty. That's why RR sucked at Michigan. It runs up a lot of stats on a lot of bad teams and fails against good defenses, period. You seem to think that because it was a good offense overall statistically, that doesn't make it soft; which is your fatal flaw here.

I certainly did watch UCLA games -- because Zach Charbonnet was our transfer to UCLA. Again, YPC means nothing. They'll pad a lot of stats against bad teams, like UCLA did. And just like Oregon did under Kelly.
 
But it's not. They were a physical rushing attack.
Physical rushing attack has less to do with RBs and more to do with lineman pushing over elite defensive lines. UCLA was absolutely not a physical rushing attack. They were a finesse running attack.
 
Physical rushing attack has less to do with RBs and more to do with lineman pushing over elite defensive lines. UCLA was absolutely not a physical rushing attack. They were a finesse running attack.

 
Back
Top