More Michigan Cheating

michaeljordan_fan said:
It's very distressing to see all this misconduct in the B1G. We were led to believe this was an honorable conference.
Click to expand...

It’s mostly Michigan. They’ve have had big scandals in football basketball baseball and hockey in my lifetime but they’ll tell you with a straight face that they “don’t do dirty things like Ohio State and the SEC”
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
It does not at all. It prohibits the school from doing that. These people were not employees or affiliated with the school in any way.
Click to expand...

LMFAO

You're clearly a brain dead idiot.

It doesn't matter if they were employees. That's why the rule states they 'can't pay the expenses of someone else to in-person scout a future opponent', because everybody would have been using that work around.

"but MiChiGan iS SmArTeR tHaN EvErYoNe eLsE" - maze&blew
 
"MiChiGaN iS sO SmARt tHeY FoUnD a LooPhOLe" - maze&blew

"Here's your Notice of Allegations" - NCAA.

LMFAO
 
You'd have been better off just sticking to the story that Stalions was a low level staffer that nobody knew.

Nope. Keep digging the hole.
 
Red_Alert said:
You'd have been better off just sticking to the story that Stalions was a low level staffer that nobody knew.

Nope. Keep digging the hole.
Click to expand...
Someday when Stallions is running the free world you ALL will be sorry!
 
osubuckeye89 said:
It’s mostly Michigan. They’ve have had big scandals in football basketball baseball and hockey in my lifetime but they’ll tell you with a straight face that they “don’t do dirty things like Ohio State and the SEC”
Click to expand...
Nah, tOSU has had a few scandals too so ya know.
 
Red_Alert said:
More than 233 pages of maze&blew's denial, distractions, and mental gymnastics?

I'll take it. :dhd:
Click to expand...
Normally this is the point where I would suggest you two get a room, but the foreplay has been happening for pages
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
That's not how that works. In NCAA land, everything not specifically called out is in fact legal (per the actual rules). Which is why they went to great lengths to define what a booster was. Unless unofficially hiring a 3rd party is specifically illegal, then it's legal.
Click to expand...
You are 100% incorrect, dimwit. It’s patently obvious to everyone but you. Imagine what teams could do if all they had to do was hire third parties to violate all the rules ands claim “it wasn’t us, it was some people we hired … gotchya, nothing you can do.”
 
NewPhoneWhoDis said:
That happens when you win a big game -- if Ohio Soft spends enough money, I'm sure Ryan Day will win a big game some day for you. Until then -- there is always 2019 to hang your hat on :pound:
Click to expand...
Ryan Day beats 10-3 Notre Dame: Calls out the idiotic fossil that personally criticized him after beating his team
Sherrone Moore beats 10-3 Penn State: Literally cries and swears on air about Harbaugh serving a suspension he deserved

LOL at "big game". It was the same win, only your coach sobbed like an infant.
 
WhosYourDawggy said:
You are 100% incorrect, dimwit. It’s patently obvious to everyone but you. Imagine what teams could do if all they had to do was hire third parties to violate all the rules ands claim “it wasn’t us, it was some people we hired … gotchya, nothing you can do.”
Click to expand...
The NCAA calls out situations where this is illegal. You are wrong.

Example, the NCAA defines a booster as an individual, agency, or organization that supports an institution's athletic program. This is specifically called out so, say, a coach can't have an unpaid fan recruiting for them in every illegal way.
WhosYourDawggy said:
Dude is one of the dumbest posters I’ve ever seen on a sports board. Imagine how hard that is.
Click to expand...
Back at you big fella. It's amazing how your bias has lead you to not even understand something as simple as how rules work. You can't infer something is illegal because that's what they meant to say but didn't write down. The NCAA will almost certainly adjust the rulebook after this; and for a reason.
 
Red_Alert said:
LMFAO

You're clearly a brain dead idiot.

It doesn't matter if they were employees. That's why the rule states they 'can't pay the expenses of someone else to in-person scout a future opponent', because everybody would have been using that work around.

"but MiChiGan iS SmArTeR tHaN EvErYoNe eLsE" - maze&blew
Click to expand...
lol, says the guy who is brain dead enough to not understand how rules work. The rule calls out institutional employees. That's pretty literally how rules actually work. It doesn't call out boosters. It doesn't call out fans. It doesn't call out 3rd parties or agencies. It bans institutional employees. Sorry, you're wrong; as much as you've convinced yourself you're right here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top