More Michigan Cheating

Across The Field said:
Dude this thread has broken handi. I've never seen someone try so desperately to get engagement with no luck.
Click to expand...

Lol he's quoting me and editing my sentences to try to make me look like im saying stupid shit, like people can't just go back and look at what I actually posted. Peak desperation.
 
osubuckeye89 said:
Lol he's quoting me and editing my sentences to try to make me look like im saying stupid shit, like people can't just go back and look at what I actually posted. Peak desperation.
Click to expand...
Yep, that's his new thing now I guess. Like I said, this thread broke him. Going page after page of being ignored has got him fucked.
 
Bwwwhahahahaha

"Handi's being ignored "

Both retards talking about Handi

I own the two of you, even while you suck each other off.
 
WhosYourDawggy said:
He makes a good point ... where is the anti-tatoo rule? You seem to require exact language when UM is breaking the rules. Otherwise it's just a grey area.
Click to expand...
There’s quite a bit of difference.
 
WhosYourDawggy said:
No, I assure you there is a rule that says you can't contract out your rule-breaking activities and then have no culpability. If you think UM is going to go with that defense I am laughing at you. That you bring that up is laughable and again shows how upset you are and desperate you have become. At some point, you are going to have to stop this nonsense and own up to it. I predict you will one day look back at this thread and be embarrassed.
Click to expand...
There may be some sub rule no one is discussing that deals in purposefully trying to escape the rules. That’s the only way I’d agree.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
There may be some sub rule no one is discussing that deals in purposefully trying to escape the rules. That’s the only way I’d agree.
Click to expand...
But your agreement isn't needed for something to be correct. You're notoriously wrong so it'd probably be more troublesome if you did agree.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
There may be some sub rule no one is discussing that deals in purposefully trying to escape the rules. That’s the only way I’d agree.
Click to expand...
Do you honestly think I care if you agree or not? You lost any level of objectivity, and any credibility on this a long time ago. You truly believe that I can decide to break the rules by hiring someone to do it for me, and I won't be violating the rules unless there is a rule that says, "you can't hire someone to break the rules for you." That's literally how stupid this and most of your other arguments have gotten.
 
osubuckeye89 said:
Uh oh. There be a paper trail




Click to expand...

Oh, fuck you, it's personal now.

The opponents targeted the most on this schedule, these people said, were not surprising. Atop the list was Ohio State, Michigan’s top rival in the Big Ten, and scouts planned to attend as many as eight games, costing more than $3,000 in travel and tickets. Next on the list was Georgia, a potential Michigan opponent in the College Football Playoff, with four or five games scheduled for in-person scouting and video-recording, also costing more than $3,000 in travel and tickets.

You cheating mother fuckers are so toast. The B1G is going to bitch slap you into oblivion. I am going to laugh so hard.
 
Handicappers said:
Bwwwhahahahaha

"Handi's being ignored "

Both retards talking about Handi

I own the two of you, even while you suck each other off.
Click to expand...
You have made multiple references to sucking cock today. Are you suing Dwight Howard?
 
WhosYourDawggy said:
Do you honestly think I care if you agree or not? You lost any level of objectivity, and any credibility on this a long time ago. You truly believe that I can decide to break the rules by hiring someone to do it for me, and I won't be violating the rules unless there is a rule that says, "you can't hire someone to break the rules for you." That's literally how stupid this and most of your other arguments have gotten.
Click to expand...
I don’t particularly care if you care. Because you’re wrong here. The “who” matters significantly. Just like the “who” matters when considering boosters and recruiting violations. Under certain circumstances you can absolutely have someone to do a task that isn’t a rule violation for them but is for you.

Now. Tonight’s information seems to indicate the “who” may not be random people but student interns. And by definition those are the same as other staff members. Which would be an outright violation of the rule.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
Who were the people attending games. That is the most important aspect of this.
Click to expand...
I mean that matters at some level, but it could be me getting paid to go to the UGA games for UM and you'd still be fucked. I would be your agent in that capacity and anything I do would be held against you.

You won't look up "Agency" so here you go - agency
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top