Yeah that was why is posted that. Bad take.
Right. And had you taken two seconds, you might have looked up the context of that rule and rules around it. Where it very specifically is dealing with an "institutional staff member"; which a friend of an institutional staff member sitting in the stands is not.
I'm having fun with it too. I do wish this wasn't happening. I also do think it's funny OSU fans think their dynasty was destroyed by a 20 something and his friends with iphones.
If last year's CFP and this season have showed us anything, the dynasty is far from over. I'd also pipe down about filing suit vs the CFP. You've still got a lot of work before you can start thinking about that.
Right. And had you taken two seconds, you might have looked up the context of that rule and rules around it. Where it very specifically is dealing with an "institutional staff member"; which a friend of an institutional staff member sitting in the stands is not.
You realize how stupid an argument that is, right? You can’t have others do your dirty work and say, oh, no big deal, it was a friend of a friend.Right. And had you taken two seconds, you might have looked up the context of that rule and rules around it. Where it very specifically is dealing with an "institutional staff member"; which a friend of an institutional staff member sitting in the stands is not.
Here's the thing: It says off campus, in person scouting of future opponents in the same season is prohibited. Those exceptions talk about things an institutional staff member can do. However, those exceptions by no means excuse the use of illegal scouting means performed on behalf of the university by someone regardless of their standing. You aren't interpreting this correctly.Right. And had you taken two seconds, you might have looked up the context of that rule and rules around it. Where it very specifically is dealing with an "institutional staff member"; which a friend of an institutional staff member sitting in the stands is not.
The entire paragraph, before and after, is referencing institutional staff members. It also simply doesn't make sense if that line isn't also applied to the same things every single line before and after is applied to. It doesn't make sense if that line applies to the population at large, and would make pretty much every school, and fans thereof, offenders of this. The NCAA would have a hell of a time arguing that it applies beyond institutional staff members, not only in the language they use in the subsection but also in how on earth that could possibly be applied.
The entire context of the section of that regulation is talking about institutional staff members. The implication of what "institutional members CAN do" is that the first section is about what they can't do. There is no other way around that.
Oh for sure. The loss last year was a failure of coaching IMO. They still played a great game and took the champs down to the wire.
The guy in question bought the tickets. So once again your excuse is BS as is tradition.
What you just said made 0 sense. Word for word, it says "Off-campus, in-person scouting of future opponents (in the same season) is prohibited". The next two bylaws do not by any means absolve michigan of wrongdoing if they used material that was acquired in violation of 11.6.1. You are trying to bend words to make it seem like it's a loophole, but it's not. If they used recordings that were obtained through illegal means, they've violated this rule. Somehow every single person can see that except you.
Buying tickets makes you an institutional staff member?