- Joined
- Sep 14, 2020
- Posts
- 26,517
- Reaction score
- 9,061
- Bookie:
- $ 786.00

I think it's the 3rd option, I think they wear unspecific clothing.You’re missing the point. Would they wear orange, or would they stand out in their maize and blue?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think it's the 3rd option, I think they wear unspecific clothing.You’re missing the point. Would they wear orange, or would they stand out in their maize and blue?
Maybe he knew someone (family or friend). For some reason the only team I would not be on the sidelines of is ohio state, and I am not connected with the University of Michigan Football team (other than an Alumni).So no plausible reason for him to be there besides cheating for his employer.
This whole thing has been going on longer than it would take to build a new stadium. If it has not been adjudicated by now, something is holding it up. What is it?And you said this could be made up lolololololol
The deadline has been extended multiple times with new evidenceMaybe he knew someone (family or friend). For some reason the only team I would not be on the sidelines of is ohio state, and I am not connected with the University of Michigan Football team (other than an Alumni).
This whole thing has been going on longer than it would take to build a new stadium. If it has not been adjudicated by now, something is holding it up. What is it?
Don't count on it Sparky. Everybody knows the ncaa moves slower than Grandma's molasses. This ain't over. It will take awhile, but sooner or later a ruling will come out. It could very well be like the one about UNC and the fake classes and whatever, "Nothing to see here...........move along". This isn't going to fade away. Sooner or later, the Ice Age melting speed of the ncaa will make an announcement, one way or another.
This is exactly what I said.Seriously, what the fuck … manufacturing the evidence would take less time. Everyone that is involved will be dead of old age before it’s settled.
You can convict on the evidence you have and start a whole new case with the new evidence you find!!!The deadline has been extended multiple times with new evidence
This isn't a court of law, so that comparison is illogicalYou can convict on the evidence you have and start a whole new case with the new evidence you find!!!
Is there an NCAA rule against filming signs in a game not involving one’s employer?There’s no ncaa rule against an analyst working at two different programs. Another loophole by American hero Connor Stallions.
While dressed in CMU gear and wearing recording sunglasses, at night? I said plausible.Maybe he knew someone (family or friend). For some reason the only team I would not be on the sidelines of is ohio state, and I am not connected with the University of Michigan Football team (other than an Alumni).
I’m not going to begin to guess that. I’m just laughing at your notion that this is all made up when there is physical video evidence of your Michigan football analyst on another sideline with recording sunglasses on while the accusation of Michigan stole signs continues to hover.This whole thing has been going on longer than it would take to build a new stadium. If it has not been adjudicated by now, something is holding it up. What is it?
True. Attending a College Football Game, Decoding Simplistic Signs and buying a Cheeseburger are hardly against against anyone's criminal code. However, it does come with some sort of punishment. The adjudicating institution should have done due diligence in a timely manner. Do you agree?This isn't a court of law, so that comparison is illogical
I have gear from numerous colleges that I've have taught at or visited. My favorite (after Michigan) is University of Hawaii - Hilo. Are we going to punish Michigan for that. I wear my sun glasses at night with x-ray vision and you have a small penisWhile dressed in CMU gear and wearing recording sunglasses, at night? I said plausible.
When you see something that is visible from thousands of people and you receive no tangible ill-gotten matter it's not stealing ... it is decoding simplistic signals.I’m not going to begin to guess that. I’m just laughing at your notion that this is all made up when there is physical video evidence of your Michigan football analyst on another sideline with recording sunglasses on while the accusation of Michigan stole signs continues to hover.
OkTrue. Attending a College Football Game, Decoding Simplistic Signs and buying a Cheeseburger are hardly against against anyone's criminal code. However, it does come with some sort of punishment. The adjudicating institution should have done due diligence in a timely manner. Do you agree?
If in fact you do agree, what is a timely manner? One month, three months, or an infinite amount of time? If there is a disagreement on this, the conflicting parties may have to go to a reasonable person's standard ... which would make it civil. Having no evidence (other than hearsay from the press or this site), I can not pretend to come up with an unbiased opinion. Being a Shameless Michigan Homer, I doubt that my opinion would be unbiased.
Were you employed by the University of Michigan as a football analyst while you taped Hawaiis opponents sideline (a Michigan future opponent) and wearing those X-ray glasses while dreaming of another man’s penis?I have gear from numerous colleges that I've have taught at or visited. My favorite (after Michigan) is University of Hawaii - Hilo. Are we going to punish Michigan for that. I wear my sun glasses at night with x-ray vision and you have a small penis![]()
I’m going to guess the matter of filming said simplistic signals on the opposing sideline of a game not involving one’s employer is the problem. But continue to double down on pure stupid thinking that Michigan didn’t cheat.When you see something that is visible from thousands of people and you receive no tangible ill-gotten matter it's not stealing ... it is decoding simplistic signals.
Kinda sensitive about it, eh?Were you employed by the University of Michigan as a football analyst while you taped Hawaiis opponents sideline (a Michigan future opponent) and wearing those X-ray glasses while dreaming of another man’s penis?
Have I ever said Michigan didn’t cheat? I think you need to go through my posts and find that. I don’t have the knowledge or evidence to make an innocent or guilty claim, and neither do you.I’m going to guess the matter of filming said simplistic signals on the opposing sideline of a game not involving one’s employer is the problem. But continue to double down on pure stupid thinking that Michigan didn’t cheat.
Deflecting with another question isn’t answering my question homies. I know you see the difference but are unwilling to answer.Kinda sensitive about it, eh?
You floated the idea it was all made up. There would be no reason to do that if you didn’t in some capacity believe that. I asked you to give ONE me plausible explanation for what we have Stallion’s doing on film if it’s not for Michigan cheating and you have yet to give me one. Why?? Because even the most ridiculous homers can’t defend it with an honest face.Have I ever said Michigan didn’t cheat? I think you need to go through my posts and find that. I don’t have the knowledge or evidence to make an innocent or guilty claim, and neither do you.
Do you think the adjudication of this matter was done in a reasonably timely manner?
Nope. I can film all the games I want without violating ncaa rules.Is there an NCAA rule against filming signs in a game not involving one’s employer?
Nope. I can film all the games I want without violating ncaa rules.
What question would you like me to answer. I will give you a short and honest answer.Deflecting with another question isn’t answering my question homies. I know you see the difference but are unwilling to answer.
Do you expect me to make a case against Michigan? What do you have proving Michigan's guilt without hearsay or conveniently circumstantial?You floated the idea it was all made up. There would be no reason to do that if you didn’t in some capacity believe that. I asked you to give ONE me plausible explanation for what we have Stallion’s doing on film if it’s not for Michigan cheating and you have yet to give me one. Why?? Because even the most ridiculous homers can’t defend it with an honest face.
It wasn’t timely at all, but saying such doesn’t mean this didn’t happen or this matter isn’t serious.
You Michigan fans are definitely a Different breed.
Let me be clear. There’s no ncaa rule that prevents me from going to any game in the country, recording their sideline and sending that to any team I want.Nice mental gymnastics, except tv isn't constantly showing the team's sidelines.
That's why Stalions was sent and was sending other people to opponents games personally. It was to get the video they were missing from tv.
Let me be clear. There’s no ncaa rule that prevents me from going to any game in the country, recording their sideline and sending that to any team I want.
Nope. I can film all the games I want without violating ncaa rules.