Is she DTF though?You need a date at the High School Dance and all of the hot girls are taken so you go with the a "6" or so just to have someone to dance with.
I’m not buying dinner unless I’m getting a handy AT LEAST!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is she DTF though?You need a date at the High School Dance and all of the hot girls are taken so you go with the a "6" or so just to have someone to dance with.
A plethora of hype videos out of the athletic dept?
It's been pointed out their GOR's are 15 years deep, as well as legislation that binds some of those to the hips of others.
The $76 million each for TX/OU is chump change compared to those.
I can see them going after those teams but not sure any will bite except UVA. I think there still has to be some geographical connection (even if it is a stretch). Every team added to a Power 5 except West Virginia has had some type of Geographical connection to the league where it could fit in and create some synergy. For example, Nebraska is connected to Iowa and is very close to Minnesota and Wisconsin and can be somewhat classified as Midwest. Maryland and Rutgers have connection to Penn State.
Regarding SEC, Texas A&M had played LSU 50x prior to joining the league and was in a league with Arkansas in the past. Similar situation with Texas and its relationship with Texas A&M and Arkansas. Oklahoma has a connection with Missouri and borders Arkansas. Arkansas-Oklahoma also has the Barry Switzer connection.
Colorado and Utah are Western teams and it wasn't a stretch to fit them in with the Pac12.
I wish Tennessee would get they're shit together. It's hard to hate a Vol when you feels sorry for them. LOL
UVA is located next to Maryland. NC is located next to VA. It's not much of a stretch and the Big Ten knows they need a presence in the South. If the ACC starts to crack, those universities would prefer the Big Ten to the SEC due to the academic alliance of the Big Ten.
Correct about the GORs. That's why I said down the road. I don't anticipate them leaving anytime soon.
People also said Oklahoma and Oklahoma State were tied to the hip. That changes when it becomes survival mode.
True but the B1G will have a hard time making inroads in the South because the SEC is king there. UNC will bring basketball but I still see Carolina recruits going to Clemson, Tennessee, South Carolina, Virginia Tech, etc. before UNC in the B1G. There just isn't the connection with the teams up north for the players. The B1G would be smarter to expand to West Coast instead. To me, B1G's best bet would be to grab Kansas, Oregon, Colorado, USC, and UCLA.
"Said" is a key word. It wasn't the case as in there was no legislation like those that "said". It was simply preference.
One of our ACC guys here has pointed out there is actual legislation in place for UNC/N.C. state.
SEC will be king in the deep south but the Big Ten has had some success recruiting in the state of Virginia. Adding UNC could give them more of a presence in the upper south.
As I said, that stuff will be thrown out the window if they're in survival mode. They are going to let both schools drown. On top of that, NC State could potentially get an SEC invite. If both of them find homes, I wouldn't be surprised to see them go separate ways.
As I said, that stuff will be thrown out the window if they're in survival mode. They are going to let both schools drown. On top of that, NC State could potentially get an SEC invite. If both of them find homes, I wouldn't be surprised to see them go separate ways.
You realize legislation is law right? It's not a fucking handshake and a wink.
It would take equal legislation to undo previous legislation.
True. In that scenario, Penn State would probably be the biggest winner. The ACC has a VERY LARGE buy-out though so getting one of their teams is going to be more expensive then even the SEC grabbing Oklahoma and Texas and maybe just as controversial if not more. Getting Kansas costs next to nothing right now.
Regarding the Conference expansion, what if Kansas and Notre Dame are the two teams the B1G is after?
I do think that if the Kansas rumors are true, they will need another team.
You realize legislation is law right? It's not a fucking handshake and a wink.
It would take equal legislation to undo previous legislation.
Getting Kansas costs $76 million "right now".
Same as TX/OU.
LOL
True. In that scenario, Penn State would probably be the biggest winner. The ACC has a VERY LARGE buy-out though so getting one of their teams is going to be more expensive then even the SEC grabbing Oklahoma and Texas and maybe just as controversial if not more. Getting Kansas costs next to nothing right now.
Regarding the Conference expansion, what if Kansas and Notre Dame are the two teams the B1G is after?
I do think that if the Kansas rumors are true, they will need another team.
Do you have a state code to cite to? Any laws would be public and easily readable for this forum.
Generally, a lot of these "state laws" are more fiction and rumors than in reality. There are also different types of laws and a lot of laws have a sunset clause that defines and end date to the law.
You realize how quickly that could happen, right? Changing a state law isn't amending the US Constitution
Nope, league goes under 8 teams, it let's them out of a contract. A league of 7 teams is not a league per the TV contract.