GAME VT @ 7 MIAMI | 7:30ET | ESPN

UbetterDUCK said:
I’m not sure on this rule - help me out fellas. Both players did not have full possession of the ball. The defensive player was out of bounds and touching the ball. Isn’t that “illegal touching” therefore a defensive penalty? If so VT should’ve had another shot at it - or am I out of my dot?
Click to expand...

You're wrong
 
wildturkey said:
That is fucking horseshit. Complete and utter horseshit

At the very least, its not enough evidence to overturn the call.

Bunch of fucking dumbasses that can't follow their own rules
Click to expand...

wildturkey said:
Doesn't matter. They ruled it. They have a process to follow. And they didn't follow it. They fucked us over
Click to expand...
I think this is emotion

The correct call was made, never had possession
 
wildturkey said:
Doesn't matter. They ruled it. They have a process to follow. And they didn't follow it. They fucked us over
Click to expand...
I thought it was 50-50. It looked like maybe they didn’t have evidence but it also looks like he never had full control. That is call they can literally fuck whoever they want
 
michaeljordan_fan said:
Pain is coming for the Suckeyes Oct 12
Click to expand...
Bill Murray Rodeo GIF
 
They didn't make the correct call after the play. Took too long to call it, guessed it was a catch, saw on the replay that he never really controlled it. It sucks but in the end they got it right
 
Twitter has decided. VT was robbed. The end.

1000004022.png
 
It was absolutely the right call, he never had possession, I seen it with both of my good eyes and I can see to the moon.
 
Hate to say this, but VT will not play with this much intensity the rest of the season and lose 3-4+ games this season.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top