- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 6,575
- Reaction score
- 4,825
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00




I think it's flawed that just because there was more parity in CFB this year, doesn't mean it was a "down year". I think you'll find that Michigan may not have the 1st rounders, but may have a near record year for the program in terms of players drafted. Michigan was good this year not because of a few elite players that will be high draft picks, but because they had a lot of old players and most of them will be draft picks.
Yeah, that's kind of my point. Michigan was fortunate to have a bunch of guys still be eligible because of the Covid year. It's not a slight, it just is what it is. Teams like OSU, UGA, and Bama etc, I'm guessing, didn't have as many guys take advantage of that rule because those guys are off to the NFL. That made older teams(like Michigan and Washington), have a huge advantage this year. Props to Michigan for playing the system perfect with that and NIL. I do think the longer we get into NIL and the transfer portal it will cause more parity, which in turn, will lessen the chances of elite, historical teams.