Who will win Heisman

So you're main two points for saying the SEC is the best is because they had a bunch of guys drafted and would win hypothetical games. Lmao.
And your main point is Oregon barely beat a bad team from the Big 12, so that means the PAC is better than the Big 12 now? Or Washington beat arguably one of the worst team in the country, in Michigan State, so the PAC is now better than the B1G. Or Utah beat a 5-5 Florida team, So the PAC is definitely better than the SEC.

Hell -- ND embarrassed USC -- So that must mean ND would be the best team in the PAC. As you said, Lmao.
 
And your main point is Oregon barely beat a bad team from the Big 12, so that means the PAC is better than the Big 12 now? Or Washington beat arguably one of the worst team in the country, in Michigan State, so the PAC is now better than the B1G. Or Utah beat a 5-5 Florida team, So the PAC is definitely better than the SEC.

Hell -- ND embarrassed USC -- So that must mean ND would be the best team in the PAC. As you said, Lmao.

Now do the SEC...
 
The SEC has had the most players drafted into the NFL the last 17 years. The only conference who even has a shot to take them down is the B1G. Out of curiosity -- what conference do you think is the best conference?

To put it in perspective how big the talent disparity is between the conferences -- Out of the top 150 picks in the NFL draft last year. 44 were from the SEC. 36 were from the B1G. Next closest......the ACC with 19. The Big 12 with 17. The PAC with 16.

You can go year by year and it is the EXACT SAME THING, this year won't be different. The B1G may close the gap, because Michigan will set the NFL record for draft picks next year because we lose 90% of our starters. But the SEC is simply way more talented than every other conference.
You need a girlfriend, buddy
 
Michigan fans fighting in seemingly ever thread now lol
 
And your main point is Oregon barely beat a bad team from the Big 12, so that means the PAC is better than the Big 12 now? Or Washington beat arguably one of the worst team in the country, in Michigan State, so the PAC is now better than the B1G. Or Utah beat a 5-5 Florida team, So the PAC is definitely better than the SEC.

Hell -- ND embarrassed USC -- So that must mean ND would be the best team in the PAC. As you said, Lmao.

Who are the teams the SEC beat?
 
Who are the teams the SEC beat?
Ole Miss did beat Tulane. Missouri beat Kansas State. South Carolina beat Jacksonville State. Well, shit, I got tired of looking. There are some Furman's, Austin-Peay's, and Mercer's in there somewhere too. Sorry, that's all I got.
 
Who are the teams the SEC beat?
I'm too tired to argue. You are right. The PAC is the premiere conference in 2023. They haven't had a team in the CFP since 2016, but this year, they may just say, screw it and put 4 teams from PAC in.
 
I'm too tired to argue. You are right. The PAC is the premiere conference in 2023. They haven't had a team in the CFP since 2016, but this year, they may just say, screw it and put 4 teams from PAC in.
1 is enough
 
Daniels doesn't have to run -- hence the fact he has the 3rd most passing yards in CFB. He can run.
I think some teams are going to regret passing on him for other qbs.
 
1 is enough
FSU looks like they are going undefeated. UM or OSU will go undefeated.

The SEC is getting at least one, and if Bama beats Georgia -- I wouldn't be shocked if it were two.

Even if Georgia beats Bama.

It'd come down to Oregon or Texas if they both avenge their earlier losses. Texas will face the same Tech team Oregon faced at the end of the year. If they blow out Tech, with the Big 12 title and the OOC win over Bama -- I think they'd get in over Oregon.
 
FSU looks like they are going undefeated. UM or OSU will go undefeated.

The SEC is getting at least one, and if Bama beats Georgia -- I wouldn't be shocked if it were two.

Even if Georgia beats Bama.

It'd come down to Oregon or Texas if they both avenge their earlier losses. Texas will face the same Tech team Oregon faced at the end of the year. If they blow out Tech, with the Big 12 title and the OOC win over Bama -- I think they'd get in over Oregon.

So you think Texas beating Texas Tech and whoever is in the BigXII CCG will trump Oregon State and Washington? Keep in mind the committee says Oregon is better NOW.

The weed must be good where you are.

In terms of a non-champ SEC team, they won't get in over a 1-loss PAC champ.
 
I think some teams are going to regret passing on him for other qbs.
Yeah -- he looks like a video game when he is playing some times. Only thing that could hurt him is his slight build. They say he is 6'4" 210 lbs, but I'd bet he is under 200.

You don't want to do too much running if you are tall and slender in the NFL, unless you are Lamar Jackson
 
So you think Texas beating Texas Tech and whoever is in the BigXII CCG will trump Oregon State and Washington? Keep in mind the committee says Oregon is better NOW.

The weed must be good where you are.

In terms of a non-champ SEC team, they won't get in over a 1-loss PAC champ.
Yes. They will have a common opponent. If Texas absolutely blows out Tech, to go along with winning the Big 12 and the OOC win at Bama. I think they put Texas in, because it is Texas.

Would it be fair to Oregon? No. This is worst case scenario for Oregon. Last time you want to see when it comes down to picking a CFP team is a blue blood with a conference title. Texas would have that AND the best OOC win by far.

I think Oregon is a great team, but when you look at OOC and see the best OOC team you faced was 5-5 Texas Tech and you were trailing by 9 going into the 4th quarter and only won by 8. If Texas goes and just annihilates them -- it is a bad look, even though transitive property shouldn't matter, but if it comes down to Texas or Oregon -- they will have to.
 
Yes. They will have a common opponent. If Texas absolutely blows out Tech, to go along with winning the Big 12 and the OOC win at Bama. I think they put Texas in, because it is Texas.

Texas IS Texas now....and they are behind Oregon. It's not like the committee is unaware of who Texas is.

Besides, we all know that the committee downplays early games.
 
Wait a minute. We are going by the Transitive Property? Oregon barely beats Texas Tech. Assume Texas kills Texas Tech, so Texas is better than Oregon? That isn't Transitive Property. That is common opponent factor. You want true Transitive Property? South Alabama beat (actually brutalized) Oklahoma State, Oklahoma State beat Oklahoma, Oklahoma beat Texas... I won't finish that statement.
 
Back
Top