- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 41,828
- Reaction score
- 50,531
- Bookie:
- $ 10,650.00




I wasn’t complimenting or insulting anyone(a stupid person trying to sound smart would have snuck a “nor” in there)Weird compliment.
Thanks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wasn’t complimenting or insulting anyone(a stupid person trying to sound smart would have snuck a “nor” in there)Weird compliment.
Thanks.
I wasn’t complimenting or insulting anyone(a stupid person trying to sound smart would have snuck a “nor” in there)
Whom
Only if it's used incorrectly.
This might be the only example but I don't think anyone gets this one wrong"To who it may concern." - Abject moron.
"To whom it may concern." - Regular person.
That’s literally the only place where “whom” should ever be used. Using it in any other circumstance is just obnoxiousThis might be the only example but I don't think anyone gets this one wrong
This might be the only example but I don't think anyone gets this one wrong
That’s literally the only place where “whom” should ever be used. Using it in any other circumstance is just obnoxious
I've seen it.
I instantly distrust anyone who does it.
To me, for a word to qualify it has to be a word that everyone knows what it means and how to use properly, but nobody ever does because it sounds ridiculous, so yes, “apt” qualifiesHow about "apt."
I use that a lot and am never trying to sound smart while using it.
To me, for a word to qualify it has to be a word that everyone knows what it means and how to use properly, but nobody ever does because it sounds ridiculous, so yes, “apt” qualifies
How often do you use “whom” in verbal communication?Why do you hate English?
With the period it the end, it looks like you’re trying to shorten “appointment,” which is just lazy.Apt.
Whenever grammatical conventions require it.How often do you use “whom” in verbal communication?
With the period it the end, it looks like you’re trying to shorten “appointment,” which is just lazy.
Only like 17 timesI haven't read all the pages, but has "irregardless" been mentioned?