The more I look into the moon landing the more I do wonder. I mean, we had the technology in 1969 to get there, but we have never sent humans back there. No other country has sent humans there since 1969?
You look at some of the photos and the spacecraft stuff looks like piles of junk put together and you are telling me it took humans to the moon? Looking at the photos the surface of the moon also looks non-natural.
People will say there is no reason for us to send humans back to the moon because it is too dangerous and we can just send robots to explore. But really? We sent humans in 1969 up there in what appears to be less than ideal equipment, and 50+ years we've decided we can't do it again?
Also there is zero stars in any photographs or video from on the moon. I've seen people respond to this that it has something to do with the technology of the camera or something that can't pick up stars. What?? We just sent multiple people to the moon and we don't have the technology that can capture stars in the background?! I drive 15 minutes out of town on a clear night and the sky is full of stars, but being up on the moon where there is zero artificial light and it can't pick up one star?
Anyways, I don't know, never thought I would be in the camp that thinks the moon landing was fake, but I have become highly skeptical.