- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 13,318
- Reaction score
- 18,391
- Bookie:
- $ 2,800.00




My question is what's the point of trying to question and poke holes in her claim at this point, when even the people doing that seem to agree it's fair that he gets fired for everything up to the non consensual claim anyway?
Like, "yeah, that's all fucked up and he should be fired, but I'll be damned if I believe her claim that it wasn't consensual!"
What's that all about? So many ways this whole thing could have played out based on the info we know, and the hill some of you want to die on is "she was just mad he wouldn't let her listen to him beat off anymore." Obviously the most plausible explanation...
Like, "yeah, that's all fucked up and he should be fired, but I'll be damned if I believe her claim that it wasn't consensual!"
What's that all about? So many ways this whole thing could have played out based on the info we know, and the hill some of you want to die on is "she was just mad he wouldn't let her listen to him beat off anymore." Obviously the most plausible explanation...
