- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 4,326
- Reaction score
- 2,024
- Bookie:
- $ 7,613.00
Floyd of RosedaleWhy the hell does Iowa have three protected matchups?
Heroes Trophy
Heartland Trophy
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Floyd of RosedaleWhy the hell does Iowa have three protected matchups?
But it won't be "next best" based on national ranking. It will be "next best" based on B10 record.That's not relevant to what I was asking since there aren't divisions anymore. When was the last time the top B1G team was ranked 2nd and the next best B1G team was ranked 11 or 12? Iowa was 16th but they were the 4th highest ranked B1G team.
And the answer is still the same. OSU was 2nd, and PSU/Iowa were tied for 3rd but PSU had the tiebreaker since they destroyed Iowa H2H, so Iowa would not sniff the B1G CCG without divisions. Again, it's an extremely rare occasion, what you're referring to.But it won't be "next best" based on national ranking. It will be "next best" based on B10 record.
Didn't take long to find a clusterfuck. 2019 B10 standingsAnd the answer is still the same. OSU was 2nd, and PSU/Iowa were tied for 3rd but PSU had the tiebreaker since they destroyed Iowa H2H, so Iowa would not sniff the B1G CCG without divisions. Again, it's an extremely rare occasion, what you're referring to.
You found an example where #1 played #8. After the CCG that year, OSU was #2, Wisconsin was #8, and PSU was #10. That example does not help your point in the slightest.Didn't take long to find a clusterfuck. 2019 B10 standings
Ohio State 9-0 in conference, ranked ranked #1
Penn State, Minnesota and Wisconsin all tied in the B10 2nd spot at 7-2
Minnesota beat Penn State, lost to Wisconsin
Wisconsin beat Minnesota, didn't play Penn State
Penn State lost to Minnesota, didn't play Wisconsin
Rankings before the B10 CCG
Wisc #8
Penn State #10
Minn #18
Not entirely sure how that tiebreaker works in the current system, but there's a ton of potential fo borderline teams to make it into the CCG there.
I expect this kind of clusterfuck to be a regular occurance, especially with 18 teams.
Didn't take long to find a clusterfuck. 2019 B10 standings
Ohio State 9-0 in conference, ranked ranked #1
Penn State, Minnesota and Wisconsin all tied in the B10 2nd spot at 7-2
Minnesota beat Penn State, lost to Wisconsin
Wisconsin beat Minnesota, didn't play Penn State
Penn State lost to Minnesota, didn't play Wisconsin
Rankings before the B10 CCG
Wisc #8
Penn State #10
Minn #18
Not entirely sure how that tiebreaker works in the current system, but there's a ton of potential fo borderline teams to make it into the CCG there.
I expect this kind of clusterfuck to be a regular occurance, especially with 18 teams.
You found an example where #1 played #8. After the CCG that year, OSU was #2, Wisconsin was #8, and PSU was #10. That example does not help your point in the slightest.
You found an example where #1 played #8. After the CCG that year, OSU was #2, Wisconsin was #8, and PSU was #10. That example does not help your point in the slightest.
But that was only because of the west division excluding Penn State. And Penn State lost to the other team tied for 2nd, Minnesota. Creating a 3 team tie that didn't exist in 2019 because of the divisions.Yeah but Wisconsin didn't drop after losing that game (funny enough, Ohio State dropped after winning it) so this kind of flies in the face of your theory.
This doesn't illustrate your point about teams not wanting to play in the CCG at all. You provided an example where #1 played #8 and there was also still #10 Penn State, all 3 would've made the playoff and nobody dropped from the CCG. Do you have any other examples or...?But that was only because of the west division excluding Penn State. And Penn State lost to the other team tied for 2nd, Minnesota. Creating a 3 team tie that didn't exist in 2019 because of the divisions.
How they drop really depends on what teams do/lose around them. Especially important when the playoff expands to 12. They mostly just considered the top 4 in the past, most of the rankings below that just didn't change because there was no need to.
The playoff committee doesn't spend time re-ranking the whole group like that in the 4 team playoff. Most of the teams stay the same in their final post-CCG ranking for a reason. Because they don't matter. Now they do matter, which changes the format.This doesn't illustrate your point about teams not wanting to play in the CCG at all. You provided an example where #1 played #8 and there was also still #10 Penn State, all 3 would've made the playoff and nobody dropped from the CCG. Do you have any other examples or...?
9 teams outside of the top 4 had their ranking change in the CFP rankings following the CCGs, including 4 teams between #6-#13 who had no shot of making the CFP, so they do re-rank several teams. Could be that Wisconsin didn't drop because they genuinely still thought they were the 8th best team? Also the AP poll means nothing considering it doesn't impact the CFP rankings in the slightest.The playoff committee doesn't spend time re-ranking the whole group like that in the 4 team playoff. Most of the teams stay the same in their final post-CCG ranking for a reason. Because they don't matter. Now they do matter, which changes the format.
Note in the AP poll Wisconsin dropped from 10 to 11 and Penn State from 12 to 13. A poll that actually re-ranks the full list through the end of the season.
Floyd is the only one that matters.Floyd of Rosedale
Heroes Trophy
Heartland Trophy
Indiana
Purdue
Rutger
UCLA
Illinois
We are in for a wild next 5 yearsIndiana
Purdue
Rutger
UCLA
Illinois