2024 Recruiting Thread
- Thread starter MAIZEandBLUE09
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 14,749
- Reaction score
- 11,322
- Bookie:
- $ 6,000.00
BV certainly has a type
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2020
- Posts
- 14,058
- Reaction score
- 29,311
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
Yeah he looks like a Colton Vasek clone to me.
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 14,749
- Reaction score
- 11,322
- Bookie:
- $ 6,000.00
that was my first thought too.. haven't heard about him too much so far.. but I figured he won't be able to contribute til next season at the earliest
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 14,749
- Reaction score
- 11,322
- Bookie:
- $ 6,000.00
@WhosYourDawggy Calhoun is committing Saturday.. is he a lock to y'all?
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2020
- Posts
- 14,058
- Reaction score
- 29,311
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
I figured after you lost that kid to Texas Tech you would go hard after Wingo.
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
- Posts
- 8,442
- Reaction score
- 6,883
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
Looking good for him. Next 7 days are going to "big" for the Dawgs. Expect to get 3 of these 4 OL, most likely all 4. That will shut down the OL for the year.
- Michael Uini announcing tomorrow
- Daniel Calhoun announcing July 5
- Nyier Daniels announcing July 7
- Marques Easley announcing July 8
Daniel Calhoun, Georgia Bulldogs, Offensive Tackle
Has played some basketball at the high school level. ---- 2023: Transferred into Marietta Walton ahead of senior season where he’s expected protect the...
247sports.com
Nyier Daniels, Georgia Bulldogs, Offensive Tackle
2022: Played offensive tackle as a junior. Helped Bergen Catholic to an 11-1 record and the New Jersey Non-Public A championship.
247sports.com
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
- Posts
- 8,442
- Reaction score
- 6,883
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
That came out of nowhere ... he's been trending hard for UTjr.
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 14,749
- Reaction score
- 11,322
- Bookie:
- $ 6,000.00
i'm not buying it even with the Fong..we are like the 3rd school he's fong'd too lol
Hudson is a tough loss but I'm sure Sark will get another WR this class and attack the portal again
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
- Posts
- 8,442
- Reaction score
- 6,883
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
So, here is what really happened. All you people jumping to conclusions, blow me!
;TLDR - Older girl actually statutory rape on the recruit. Everything consensual. Her story changed. Turns out she's a psycho as her texts show.
Initial Interview – June 11, 2022
An ACCPD police officer is dispatched to an Athens hotel where he meets with a 20-year-old female. That young lady states that she was forced by Jarrett to have oral sex.
She tells the officer that the two met on instagram in late March of 2022. An on-line relationship formed as they continued to converse through social media and texts until June 7, 2022.
At that point, Jarrett and the young woman decided to meet in person. Jarrett initiated the meet with a message asking her if she was “trying to link.”
Jarrett, 16-years-old at the time, was set to arrive for his official visit at Georgia on June 10. The aforementioned female, in an effort to meet and spend time with Jarrett in person, elected to get a room at the same hotel where Jarrett was staying.
An evening in the hotel resulted in the two spending most of the night together. She states that the two had consensual sex with a condom. Jarrett requested to remove the condom and the female complied.
Once the two were finished having intercourse, Jarrett left to participate in his official visit activities at Georgia. He returned to the young lady’s room between the hours of 2am and 4am where the female began performing oral sex on him again.
According to the young lady, every thing was consensual until Jarrett started filming with his phone. At that point Jarrett’s accuser states that she told him no and that she wanted to stop.
She then claims that Jarrett grabbed her by her head and forced her to keep going. She said that it was so forceful that it caused some of the glue attaching her wig to break loose from the front and side parts of her head.
Jarrett allegedly reached climax after that with the police report detailing graphic details shared by his accuser. The used condom and towels were collected as evidence by the ACCPD.
At that point the young lady says that the two spent the next couple of hours in her bed until Jarret’s alarm went off. At that point he went back to his room.
Jamaal Jarrett Interview — June 11, 2022
Jarrett made his way to the Athens-Clarke County Police’s East Precinct where he was accompanied by his mother and Georgia director of player support and operations Bryant Gantt. Jarrett told officers that he wanted to give a statement but only to a detective.
He spoke to police voluntarily, with his mother and Gantt in the room, and discussed his version of the events of Friday evening and Saturday morning. At this time his accuser was “at the FPC with SANE and an advocate from The Cottage. She was getting a Sane Exam.”
Jarrett told police a similar story about how the two had met on social media and had been exchanging messages since then. He stated that he went to her room before attending a dinner event that night and that it was the first time they had met in person.
According to Jarrett, the young lady almost immediately began performing fellatio. He says that he had to leave afterward but they arranged a meeting for later in that evening. The two were in communication throughout the evening per Jarrett’s account.
When he returned to her room later that night, Jarrett says that the two had intercourse and she performed oral sex on him again. He said that he wanted to video and she agreed, claiming that she held the phone “for the first time.”
The two eventually went to sleep and he got up later to go back to his room. Per Jarrett, his accuser started to complain of being tired toward the end of their time together but he then said that she resumed performing oral sex after that.
When the officer asked Jarrett what might cause her to “change her tone” and give a different version of events, he wasn’t sure. He then mentioned how there was a text message conversation that ensued the morning after the alleged incident.
Jarrett claims that he was busy with events and tours and became short with his accuser. She was checking on him and Jarrett felt that his short responses might have angered her.
At that point he gave his phone, which was in airplane mode, over the the Athens-Clarke County Police. He and his mother signed consent forms for it to be searched while also providing the passcode. Jarrett agreed to buccal swabs that were sent as evidence with the SAECK.
Second Interview with female accuser – June 11, 2022
Officer Daniel Schmidt, who conducted the interview with Jarrett, then went to the FPC to meet with the accuser and an advocate. The interview was recorded onto a DVD.
The accuser told Schmidt that she was conflicted on what to do. She stated that she cared for Jarrett and his future. She went on to confirm the details of how they met and formed a relationship. Her story matched up with Jarrett’s and said that she first saw him during the Celebration Saturday National Championship Parade in January of 2022.
Jarrett’s accuser went on to describe the events of the previous night and morning. Officer Schmidt goes on to say that it was clear at that point that there was “no problem” until the camera became involved.
That’s when things became ambiguous according to the investigator. It was unclear at that point whether Jarrett forced her into anything or if she only had an issue it being videoed. The accuser states that she said no, but it was a “different kind of no” like saying “I’m tired” “Do I have to?” “My jaws are tired.” The police report uses quotations, indicating that those were her words.
Schmidt reports that during this interview and multiple others of the follow-up nature, the accuser didn’t articulate force being used at any point. She did mention that the glue used for her wig was broken and that it was pulled back, but the officer says that, “as described” it seemed to indicate that it had happened accidentally during “extremely enthusiastic sex/oral sex.”
Her details in the second and follow-up interviews also lined up “entirely” with what Jarrett had told the officer. Jarrett’s accuser was asked whether or not she controlled the phone for video purposes during their sexual encounter and confirmed that she held the phone for the first video.
In addition, she confirmed the details of the text exchange later that morning and showed the officer those messages on her phone.
The text message exchange…
Below is the text-message conversation between Jarrett and his accuser in the hours after the alleged incident. ACCPD inspected the phones belonging to both parties. The messages begin at 6:22 a.m. on June 11, 2022
Female (F): are you in your room.
Jarrett: Just got to it.
F: sleep tight handsome
Jarrett: Thx
F: Don’t forget to move those vids to my eyes only frfr (for real, for real).
Jarrett: I did
F: thanks.
Jarrett: (thumbs up emoji)
F (9:13 a.m.): you alive?
Jarrett: Yeah
F:
good morningJarrett: Morning
F: damn why you so short
Jarrett: nun
just tired
F: … so you’re short and dry bc of that?
Jarrett: It’s too early to argue
F: woah
I’m not arguing
Jarrett: .
F: jah seriously what’s wrong?
Like I’m genuinely concerned now ? are you really just tired”
Will you do me a huge favor frfr.
And I’m trusting you with this … I rlly didn’t feel comfortable w the videos. Like at all. Can you delete those. Frfr. ?
Jarrett: I did
F: what’s wrong with you?
Can you please tell me
Jarrett: I just woke up and it’s 21 questions.
Lol pipe down
F: (frowning face emjoi)
This isn’t like you omg… I just wanna know what I did
Are you out yet or still in your room?
Jarrett: Out
F: can you please explain why you’re so mad at me?
Jah please.
Jah. Idc if you ghost me forever… well i do care. but please say those videos are gone. Even out of your recents. please
Jarrett: I don’t have em (F)
I’m not like that
Trust me
I only have two in my eyes only
F: I wanna trust you so bad
Jarrett: Just do it
F: but you woke up and we’re (sic) mad dry with me
Jarrett: nun happened
F: so you promise you’re just tired and not mad at me? (three sad face emoji faces)
Jarrett: I’m not mad at you
Do you want me to be
Follow-up details and decision to not pursue charges against Jarrett…
In the days and conversations after June 11, via phone, Jarrett’s accuser remained uncertain about whether or not to proceed but did ultimately decide that she wanted the case “potentially prosecuted.” She stated that she didn’t want it to happen to someone else.
Schmidt says in his report that by that time he had already determined that the evidence of a crime was not present.
“I had also reviewed and clarified the details of (her) own testimony with her to the point of confirming that she did not at any point articulate any crime being committed against her (she never directly told him to stop, took any action to try to top any given action, or articulated forced used.)”
Schmidt went on to have a conversation with Jarrett’s accuser about how, with him being 16 years of age, she was in the clear involving the sexual acts themselves. There were other charges detailed in the report that could be pursued but Schmidt told the young lady that he had no intention of pursuing those.
The circumstances were explained to Jarrett’s accuser and she was told that no further action would be taken.
Schmidt also reports that, upon checking Jarrett’s phone, the Georgia defensive lineman was telling the truth about having deleted the videos. Those were not found on his device when it was inspected via external software.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2020
- Posts
- 7,269
- Reaction score
- 6,039
- Bookie:
- $ 12,463.00
So, here is what really happened. All you people jumping to conclusions, blow me!
;TLDR - Older girl actually statutory rape on the recruit. Everything consensual. Her story changed. Turns out she's a psycho as her texts show.
Initial Interview – June 11, 2022
An ACCPD police officer is dispatched to an Athens hotel where he meets with a 20-year-old female. That young lady states that she was forced by Jarrett to have oral sex.
She tells the officer that the two met on instagram in late March of 2022. An on-line relationship formed as they continued to converse through social media and texts until June 7, 2022.
At that point, Jarrett and the young woman decided to meet in person. Jarrett initiated the meet with a message asking her if she was “trying to link.”
Jarrett, 16-years-old at the time, was set to arrive for his official visit at Georgia on June 10. The aforementioned female, in an effort to meet and spend time with Jarrett in person, elected to get a room at the same hotel where Jarrett was staying.
An evening in the hotel resulted in the two spending most of the night together. She states that the two had consensual sex with a condom. Jarrett requested to remove the condom and the female complied.
Once the two were finished having intercourse, Jarrett left to participate in his official visit activities at Georgia. He returned to the young lady’s room between the hours of 2am and 4am where the female began performing oral sex on him again.
According to the young lady, every thing was consensual until Jarrett started filming with his phone. At that point Jarrett’s accuser states that she told him no and that she wanted to stop.
She then claims that Jarrett grabbed her by her head and forced her to keep going. She said that it was so forceful that it caused some of the glue attaching her wig to break loose from the front and side parts of her head.
Jarrett allegedly reached climax after that with the police report detailing graphic details shared by his accuser. The used condom and towels were collected as evidence by the ACCPD.
At that point the young lady says that the two spent the next couple of hours in her bed until Jarret’s alarm went off. At that point he went back to his room.
Jamaal Jarrett Interview — June 11, 2022
Jarrett made his way to the Athens-Clarke County Police’s East Precinct where he was accompanied by his mother and Georgia director of player support and operations Bryant Gantt. Jarrett told officers that he wanted to give a statement but only to a detective.
He spoke to police voluntarily, with his mother and Gantt in the room, and discussed his version of the events of Friday evening and Saturday morning. At this time his accuser was “at the FPC with SANE and an advocate from The Cottage. She was getting a Sane Exam.”
Jarrett told police a similar story about how the two had met on social media and had been exchanging messages since then. He stated that he went to her room before attending a dinner event that night and that it was the first time they had met in person.
According to Jarrett, the young lady almost immediately began performing fellatio. He says that he had to leave afterward but they arranged a meeting for later in that evening. The two were in communication throughout the evening per Jarrett’s account.
When he returned to her room later that night, Jarrett says that the two had intercourse and she performed oral sex on him again. He said that he wanted to video and she agreed, claiming that she held the phone “for the first time.”
The two eventually went to sleep and he got up later to go back to his room. Per Jarrett, his accuser started to complain of being tired toward the end of their time together but he then said that she resumed performing oral sex after that.
When the officer asked Jarrett what might cause her to “change her tone” and give a different version of events, he wasn’t sure. He then mentioned how there was a text message conversation that ensued the morning after the alleged incident.
Jarrett claims that he was busy with events and tours and became short with his accuser. She was checking on him and Jarrett felt that his short responses might have angered her.
At that point he gave his phone, which was in airplane mode, over the the Athens-Clarke County Police. He and his mother signed consent forms for it to be searched while also providing the passcode. Jarrett agreed to buccal swabs that were sent as evidence with the SAECK.
Second Interview with female accuser – June 11, 2022
Officer Daniel Schmidt, who conducted the interview with Jarrett, then went to the FPC to meet with the accuser and an advocate. The interview was recorded onto a DVD.
The accuser told Schmidt that she was conflicted on what to do. She stated that she cared for Jarrett and his future. She went on to confirm the details of how they met and formed a relationship. Her story matched up with Jarrett’s and said that she first saw him during the Celebration Saturday National Championship Parade in January of 2022.
Jarrett’s accuser went on to describe the events of the previous night and morning. Officer Schmidt goes on to say that it was clear at that point that there was “no problem” until the camera became involved.
That’s when things became ambiguous according to the investigator. It was unclear at that point whether Jarrett forced her into anything or if she only had an issue it being videoed. The accuser states that she said no, but it was a “different kind of no” like saying “I’m tired” “Do I have to?” “My jaws are tired.” The police report uses quotations, indicating that those were her words.
Schmidt reports that during this interview and multiple others of the follow-up nature, the accuser didn’t articulate force being used at any point. She did mention that the glue used for her wig was broken and that it was pulled back, but the officer says that, “as described” it seemed to indicate that it had happened accidentally during “extremely enthusiastic sex/oral sex.”
Her details in the second and follow-up interviews also lined up “entirely” with what Jarrett had told the officer. Jarrett’s accuser was asked whether or not she controlled the phone for video purposes during their sexual encounter and confirmed that she held the phone for the first video.
In addition, she confirmed the details of the text exchange later that morning and showed the officer those messages on her phone.
The text message exchange…
Below is the text-message conversation between Jarrett and his accuser in the hours after the alleged incident. ACCPD inspected the phones belonging to both parties. The messages begin at 6:22 a.m. on June 11, 2022
Female (F): are you in your room.
Jarrett: Just got to it.
F: sleep tight handsome
Jarrett: Thx
F: Don’t forget to move those vids to my eyes only frfr (for real, for real).
Jarrett: I did
F: thanks.
Jarrett: (thumbs up emoji)
F (9:13 a.m.): you alive?
Jarrett: Yeah
F:
Jarrett: Morning
F: damn why you so short
Jarrett: nun
just tired
F: … so you’re short and dry bc of that?
Jarrett: It’s too early to argue
F: woah
I’m not arguing
Jarrett: .
F: jah seriously what’s wrong?
Like I’m genuinely concerned now ? are you really just tired”
Will you do me a huge favor frfr.
And I’m trusting you with this … I rlly didn’t feel comfortable w the videos. Like at all. Can you delete those. Frfr. ?
Jarrett: I did
F: what’s wrong with you?
Can you please tell me
Jarrett: I just woke up and it’s 21 questions.
Lol pipe down
F: (frowning face emjoi)
This isn’t like you omg… I just wanna know what I did
Are you out yet or still in your room?
Jarrett: Out
F: can you please explain why you’re so mad at me?
Jah please.
Jah. Idc if you ghost me forever… well i do care. but please say those videos are gone. Even out of your recents. please
Jarrett: I don’t have em (F)
I’m not like that
Trust me
I only have two in my eyes only
F: I wanna trust you so bad
Jarrett: Just do it
F: but you woke up and we’re (sic) mad dry with me
Jarrett: nun happened
F: so you promise you’re just tired and not mad at me? (three sad face emoji faces)
Jarrett: I’m not mad at you
Do you want me to be
Follow-up details and decision to not pursue charges against Jarrett…
In the days and conversations after June 11, via phone, Jarrett’s accuser remained uncertain about whether or not to proceed but did ultimately decide that she wanted the case “potentially prosecuted.” She stated that she didn’t want it to happen to someone else.
Schmidt says in his report that by that time he had already determined that the evidence of a crime was not present.
“I had also reviewed and clarified the details of (her) own testimony with her to the point of confirming that she did not at any point articulate any crime being committed against her (she never directly told him to stop, took any action to try to top any given action, or articulated forced used.)”
Schmidt went on to have a conversation with Jarrett’s accuser about how, with him being 16 years of age, she was in the clear involving the sexual acts themselves. There were other charges detailed in the report that could be pursued but Schmidt told the young lady that he had no intention of pursuing those.
The circumstances were explained to Jarrett’s accuser and she was told that no further action would be taken.
Schmidt also reports that, upon checking Jarrett’s phone, the Georgia defensive lineman was telling the truth about having deleted the videos. Those were not found on his device when it was inspected via external software.
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
- Posts
- 8,442
- Reaction score
- 6,883
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
Always amazed when people admit they aren't bight enough to read for 3 minutes.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2020
- Posts
- 7,269
- Reaction score
- 6,039
- Bookie:
- $ 12,463.00
Yeah don't care enough to spend 3 minutes to read about high school/college drama. That must be an indictment on my intelligence.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 6,445
- Reaction score
- 6,534
- Bookie:
- $ 2,409.00
Wow, that bitch belongs in jail.So, here is what really happened. All you people jumping to conclusions, blow me!
;TLDR - Older girl actually statutory rape on the recruit. Everything consensual. Her story changed. Turns out she's a psycho as her texts show.
Initial Interview – June 11, 2022
An ACCPD police officer is dispatched to an Athens hotel where he meets with a 20-year-old female. That young lady states that she was forced by Jarrett to have oral sex.
She tells the officer that the two met on instagram in late March of 2022. An on-line relationship formed as they continued to converse through social media and texts until June 7, 2022.
At that point, Jarrett and the young woman decided to meet in person. Jarrett initiated the meet with a message asking her if she was “trying to link.”
Jarrett, 16-years-old at the time, was set to arrive for his official visit at Georgia on June 10. The aforementioned female, in an effort to meet and spend time with Jarrett in person, elected to get a room at the same hotel where Jarrett was staying.
An evening in the hotel resulted in the two spending most of the night together. She states that the two had consensual sex with a condom. Jarrett requested to remove the condom and the female complied.
Once the two were finished having intercourse, Jarrett left to participate in his official visit activities at Georgia. He returned to the young lady’s room between the hours of 2am and 4am where the female began performing oral sex on him again.
According to the young lady, every thing was consensual until Jarrett started filming with his phone. At that point Jarrett’s accuser states that she told him no and that she wanted to stop.
She then claims that Jarrett grabbed her by her head and forced her to keep going. She said that it was so forceful that it caused some of the glue attaching her wig to break loose from the front and side parts of her head.
Jarrett allegedly reached climax after that with the police report detailing graphic details shared by his accuser. The used condom and towels were collected as evidence by the ACCPD.
At that point the young lady says that the two spent the next couple of hours in her bed until Jarret’s alarm went off. At that point he went back to his room.
Jamaal Jarrett Interview — June 11, 2022
Jarrett made his way to the Athens-Clarke County Police’s East Precinct where he was accompanied by his mother and Georgia director of player support and operations Bryant Gantt. Jarrett told officers that he wanted to give a statement but only to a detective.
He spoke to police voluntarily, with his mother and Gantt in the room, and discussed his version of the events of Friday evening and Saturday morning. At this time his accuser was “at the FPC with SANE and an advocate from The Cottage. She was getting a Sane Exam.”
Jarrett told police a similar story about how the two had met on social media and had been exchanging messages since then. He stated that he went to her room before attending a dinner event that night and that it was the first time they had met in person.
According to Jarrett, the young lady almost immediately began performing fellatio. He says that he had to leave afterward but they arranged a meeting for later in that evening. The two were in communication throughout the evening per Jarrett’s account.
When he returned to her room later that night, Jarrett says that the two had intercourse and she performed oral sex on him again. He said that he wanted to video and she agreed, claiming that she held the phone “for the first time.”
The two eventually went to sleep and he got up later to go back to his room. Per Jarrett, his accuser started to complain of being tired toward the end of their time together but he then said that she resumed performing oral sex after that.
When the officer asked Jarrett what might cause her to “change her tone” and give a different version of events, he wasn’t sure. He then mentioned how there was a text message conversation that ensued the morning after the alleged incident.
Jarrett claims that he was busy with events and tours and became short with his accuser. She was checking on him and Jarrett felt that his short responses might have angered her.
At that point he gave his phone, which was in airplane mode, over the the Athens-Clarke County Police. He and his mother signed consent forms for it to be searched while also providing the passcode. Jarrett agreed to buccal swabs that were sent as evidence with the SAECK.
Second Interview with female accuser – June 11, 2022
Officer Daniel Schmidt, who conducted the interview with Jarrett, then went to the FPC to meet with the accuser and an advocate. The interview was recorded onto a DVD.
The accuser told Schmidt that she was conflicted on what to do. She stated that she cared for Jarrett and his future. She went on to confirm the details of how they met and formed a relationship. Her story matched up with Jarrett’s and said that she first saw him during the Celebration Saturday National Championship Parade in January of 2022.
Jarrett’s accuser went on to describe the events of the previous night and morning. Officer Schmidt goes on to say that it was clear at that point that there was “no problem” until the camera became involved.
That’s when things became ambiguous according to the investigator. It was unclear at that point whether Jarrett forced her into anything or if she only had an issue it being videoed. The accuser states that she said no, but it was a “different kind of no” like saying “I’m tired” “Do I have to?” “My jaws are tired.” The police report uses quotations, indicating that those were her words.
Schmidt reports that during this interview and multiple others of the follow-up nature, the accuser didn’t articulate force being used at any point. She did mention that the glue used for her wig was broken and that it was pulled back, but the officer says that, “as described” it seemed to indicate that it had happened accidentally during “extremely enthusiastic sex/oral sex.”
Her details in the second and follow-up interviews also lined up “entirely” with what Jarrett had told the officer. Jarrett’s accuser was asked whether or not she controlled the phone for video purposes during their sexual encounter and confirmed that she held the phone for the first video.
In addition, she confirmed the details of the text exchange later that morning and showed the officer those messages on her phone.
The text message exchange…
Below is the text-message conversation between Jarrett and his accuser in the hours after the alleged incident. ACCPD inspected the phones belonging to both parties. The messages begin at 6:22 a.m. on June 11, 2022
Female (F): are you in your room.
Jarrett: Just got to it.
F: sleep tight handsome
Jarrett: Thx
F: Don’t forget to move those vids to my eyes only frfr (for real, for real).
Jarrett: I did
F: thanks.
Jarrett: (thumbs up emoji)
F (9:13 a.m.): you alive?
Jarrett: Yeah
F:
Jarrett: Morning
F: damn why you so short
Jarrett: nun
just tired
F: … so you’re short and dry bc of that?
Jarrett: It’s too early to argue
F: woah
I’m not arguing
Jarrett: .
F: jah seriously what’s wrong?
Like I’m genuinely concerned now ? are you really just tired”
Will you do me a huge favor frfr.
And I’m trusting you with this … I rlly didn’t feel comfortable w the videos. Like at all. Can you delete those. Frfr. ?
Jarrett: I did
F: what’s wrong with you?
Can you please tell me
Jarrett: I just woke up and it’s 21 questions.
Lol pipe down
F: (frowning face emjoi)
This isn’t like you omg… I just wanna know what I did
Are you out yet or still in your room?
Jarrett: Out
F: can you please explain why you’re so mad at me?
Jah please.
Jah. Idc if you ghost me forever… well i do care. but please say those videos are gone. Even out of your recents. please
Jarrett: I don’t have em (F)
I’m not like that
Trust me
I only have two in my eyes only
F: I wanna trust you so bad
Jarrett: Just do it
F: but you woke up and we’re (sic) mad dry with me
Jarrett: nun happened
F: so you promise you’re just tired and not mad at me? (three sad face emoji faces)
Jarrett: I’m not mad at you
Do you want me to be
Follow-up details and decision to not pursue charges against Jarrett…
In the days and conversations after June 11, via phone, Jarrett’s accuser remained uncertain about whether or not to proceed but did ultimately decide that she wanted the case “potentially prosecuted.” She stated that she didn’t want it to happen to someone else.
Schmidt says in his report that by that time he had already determined that the evidence of a crime was not present.
“I had also reviewed and clarified the details of (her) own testimony with her to the point of confirming that she did not at any point articulate any crime being committed against her (she never directly told him to stop, took any action to try to top any given action, or articulated forced used.)”
Schmidt went on to have a conversation with Jarrett’s accuser about how, with him being 16 years of age, she was in the clear involving the sexual acts themselves. There were other charges detailed in the report that could be pursued but Schmidt told the young lady that he had no intention of pursuing those.
The circumstances were explained to Jarrett’s accuser and she was told that no further action would be taken.
Schmidt also reports that, upon checking Jarrett’s phone, the Georgia defensive lineman was telling the truth about having deleted the videos. Those were not found on his device when it was inspected via external software.
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 6,571
- Reaction score
- 14,647
- Bookie:
- $ 13,200.00
So, here is what really happened. All you people jumping to conclusions, blow me!
;TLDR - Older girl actually statutory rape on the recruit. Everything consensual. Her story changed. Turns out she's a psycho as her texts show.
Initial Interview – June 11, 2022
An ACCPD police officer is dispatched to an Athens hotel where he meets with a 20-year-old female. That young lady states that she was forced by Jarrett to have oral sex.
She tells the officer that the two met on instagram in late March of 2022. An on-line relationship formed as they continued to converse through social media and texts until June 7, 2022.
At that point, Jarrett and the young woman decided to meet in person. Jarrett initiated the meet with a message asking her if she was “trying to link.”
Jarrett, 16-years-old at the time, was set to arrive for his official visit at Georgia on June 10. The aforementioned female, in an effort to meet and spend time with Jarrett in person, elected to get a room at the same hotel where Jarrett was staying.
An evening in the hotel resulted in the two spending most of the night together. She states that the two had consensual sex with a condom. Jarrett requested to remove the condom and the female complied.
Once the two were finished having intercourse, Jarrett left to participate in his official visit activities at Georgia. He returned to the young lady’s room between the hours of 2am and 4am where the female began performing oral sex on him again.
According to the young lady, every thing was consensual until Jarrett started filming with his phone. At that point Jarrett’s accuser states that she told him no and that she wanted to stop.
She then claims that Jarrett grabbed her by her head and forced her to keep going. She said that it was so forceful that it caused some of the glue attaching her wig to break loose from the front and side parts of her head.
Jarrett allegedly reached climax after that with the police report detailing graphic details shared by his accuser. The used condom and towels were collected as evidence by the ACCPD.
At that point the young lady says that the two spent the next couple of hours in her bed until Jarret’s alarm went off. At that point he went back to his room.
Jamaal Jarrett Interview — June 11, 2022
Jarrett made his way to the Athens-Clarke County Police’s East Precinct where he was accompanied by his mother and Georgia director of player support and operations Bryant Gantt. Jarrett told officers that he wanted to give a statement but only to a detective.
He spoke to police voluntarily, with his mother and Gantt in the room, and discussed his version of the events of Friday evening and Saturday morning. At this time his accuser was “at the FPC with SANE and an advocate from The Cottage. She was getting a Sane Exam.”
Jarrett told police a similar story about how the two had met on social media and had been exchanging messages since then. He stated that he went to her room before attending a dinner event that night and that it was the first time they had met in person.
According to Jarrett, the young lady almost immediately began performing fellatio. He says that he had to leave afterward but they arranged a meeting for later in that evening. The two were in communication throughout the evening per Jarrett’s account.
When he returned to her room later that night, Jarrett says that the two had intercourse and she performed oral sex on him again. He said that he wanted to video and she agreed, claiming that she held the phone “for the first time.”
The two eventually went to sleep and he got up later to go back to his room. Per Jarrett, his accuser started to complain of being tired toward the end of their time together but he then said that she resumed performing oral sex after that.
When the officer asked Jarrett what might cause her to “change her tone” and give a different version of events, he wasn’t sure. He then mentioned how there was a text message conversation that ensued the morning after the alleged incident.
Jarrett claims that he was busy with events and tours and became short with his accuser. She was checking on him and Jarrett felt that his short responses might have angered her.
At that point he gave his phone, which was in airplane mode, over the the Athens-Clarke County Police. He and his mother signed consent forms for it to be searched while also providing the passcode. Jarrett agreed to buccal swabs that were sent as evidence with the SAECK.
Second Interview with female accuser – June 11, 2022
Officer Daniel Schmidt, who conducted the interview with Jarrett, then went to the FPC to meet with the accuser and an advocate. The interview was recorded onto a DVD.
The accuser told Schmidt that she was conflicted on what to do. She stated that she cared for Jarrett and his future. She went on to confirm the details of how they met and formed a relationship. Her story matched up with Jarrett’s and said that she first saw him during the Celebration Saturday National Championship Parade in January of 2022.
Jarrett’s accuser went on to describe the events of the previous night and morning. Officer Schmidt goes on to say that it was clear at that point that there was “no problem” until the camera became involved.
That’s when things became ambiguous according to the investigator. It was unclear at that point whether Jarrett forced her into anything or if she only had an issue it being videoed. The accuser states that she said no, but it was a “different kind of no” like saying “I’m tired” “Do I have to?” “My jaws are tired.” The police report uses quotations, indicating that those were her words.
Schmidt reports that during this interview and multiple others of the follow-up nature, the accuser didn’t articulate force being used at any point. She did mention that the glue used for her wig was broken and that it was pulled back, but the officer says that, “as described” it seemed to indicate that it had happened accidentally during “extremely enthusiastic sex/oral sex.”
Her details in the second and follow-up interviews also lined up “entirely” with what Jarrett had told the officer. Jarrett’s accuser was asked whether or not she controlled the phone for video purposes during their sexual encounter and confirmed that she held the phone for the first video.
In addition, she confirmed the details of the text exchange later that morning and showed the officer those messages on her phone.
The text message exchange…
Below is the text-message conversation between Jarrett and his accuser in the hours after the alleged incident. ACCPD inspected the phones belonging to both parties. The messages begin at 6:22 a.m. on June 11, 2022
Female (F): are you in your room.
Jarrett: Just got to it.
F: sleep tight handsome
Jarrett: Thx
F: Don’t forget to move those vids to my eyes only frfr (for real, for real).
Jarrett: I did
F: thanks.
Jarrett: (thumbs up emoji)
F (9:13 a.m.): you alive?
Jarrett: Yeah
F:
Jarrett: Morning
F: damn why you so short
Jarrett: nun
just tired
F: … so you’re short and dry bc of that?
Jarrett: It’s too early to argue
F: woah
I’m not arguing
Jarrett: .
F: jah seriously what’s wrong?
Like I’m genuinely concerned now ? are you really just tired”
Will you do me a huge favor frfr.
And I’m trusting you with this … I rlly didn’t feel comfortable w the videos. Like at all. Can you delete those. Frfr. ?
Jarrett: I did
F: what’s wrong with you?
Can you please tell me
Jarrett: I just woke up and it’s 21 questions.
Lol pipe down
F: (frowning face emjoi)
This isn’t like you omg… I just wanna know what I did
Are you out yet or still in your room?
Jarrett: Out
F: can you please explain why you’re so mad at me?
Jah please.
Jah. Idc if you ghost me forever… well i do care. but please say those videos are gone. Even out of your recents. please
Jarrett: I don’t have em (F)
I’m not like that
Trust me
I only have two in my eyes only
F: I wanna trust you so bad
Jarrett: Just do it
F: but you woke up and we’re (sic) mad dry with me
Jarrett: nun happened
F: so you promise you’re just tired and not mad at me? (three sad face emoji faces)
Jarrett: I’m not mad at you
Do you want me to be
Follow-up details and decision to not pursue charges against Jarrett…
In the days and conversations after June 11, via phone, Jarrett’s accuser remained uncertain about whether or not to proceed but did ultimately decide that she wanted the case “potentially prosecuted.” She stated that she didn’t want it to happen to someone else.
Schmidt says in his report that by that time he had already determined that the evidence of a crime was not present.
“I had also reviewed and clarified the details of (her) own testimony with her to the point of confirming that she did not at any point articulate any crime being committed against her (she never directly told him to stop, took any action to try to top any given action, or articulated forced used.)”
Schmidt went on to have a conversation with Jarrett’s accuser about how, with him being 16 years of age, she was in the clear involving the sexual acts themselves. There were other charges detailed in the report that could be pursued but Schmidt told the young lady that he had no intention of pursuing those.
The circumstances were explained to Jarrett’s accuser and she was told that no further action would be taken.
Schmidt also reports that, upon checking Jarrett’s phone, the Georgia defensive lineman was telling the truth about having deleted the videos. Those were not found on his device when it was inspected via external software.
Well, then, she needs to spend a good amount of time sitting inside a jail cell.
A minimum of 3-5 years sounds good to me.
Can’t get much lower than knowingly falsely accusing someone of something like that.
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 14,749
- Reaction score
- 11,322
- Bookie:
- $ 6,000.00
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
- Posts
- 8,442
- Reaction score
- 6,883
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
Amazing that when I malign your intellect I misspelled "bright" ... so there you go.
Seriously, though, I've never understood people who don't want/dont' have time to read something actually have time to post something about it. Just don't read it.
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
- Posts
- 8,442
- Reaction score
- 6,883
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
What pisses me off is that was available to the AJC "investigative" journalist and he didn't bother to mention any of it in his article.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2020
- Posts
- 14,058
- Reaction score
- 29,311
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
Sooners land 4-star wide receiver Ivan Carreon
Oklahoma Sooners have landed another commitment. Four-star wide receiver Ivan Carreon from Odessa, Tx, is a massive target for the Sooners.He stands 6-foot-6 and weighs 195 pounds. He’s the exact kind of weapon that could help take this wide receiver room to the next level.