The notion that you can't have an opinion on wanting to change things up around here is probably the most stifling thing about the drafts. It's not the voting itself, it's not any sort of "influence" to draft players, and it's not the perceptions of new era vs. old school.
It's the actual interactions that take place that don't allow for growth. There's a difference between something not working out and not trying it entirely. What's the worst that can happen in these drafts if we switched it up for a few drafts just to try something new? It doesn't work out and we go back to what we did. Best case is that it reinvigorates the drafters and sparks debate and conversation.
Being outright dismissive of ideas is honestly what's killed things around here. I loved (and still love) drafting with you guys because I've learned so much about sports that I knew at a cursory level that I now had a deeper appreciation for.
But ya'll are out of line going at Shane this way after all the years of drafting. I said the same thing defending
@Nosferatu when he was called out a little while back by Stakes.
