It can be both. Everything the staffers created they deleted, but they weren't aware the moron was using payment types and doing other stuff they can't delete.
The messages were recovered and showed nothing.It can be both. Everything the staffers created they deleted, but they weren't aware the moron was using payment types and doing other stuff they can't delete.
Oh and the staffers don't realize what it actually takes to destroy messages and emails
www.si.com
Because this otherwise minor transgression combined with the precious thing he was already on probation for, cheeseburger gate, ridiculously makes it more serious. The ncaa views the act of deletion as a cover up; irrelevant if the content of those messages.
Messages being recovered only means someone thought deleting them would do any good.
No. If they are posts about things unrelated to sign stealing then it would irrelevant. In that case they weren't deleted messages anyone cares about and thus no suspension.
Huh? I only mentioned Ohio because they are the only team outside of Michigan in the B1G who has won anything. I'm not making it a Michigan/Ohio discussion.
Nah. I caught an employee stealing from us, first thing I did before he was even officially fired is delete all our conversations in slack and removed his calendar from my view. Seems like a pretty typical response if you ask me.
Nope. In fact the texts were discussed in the leaked Michigan response. The charge is the act, not the content. Had they included something it would have been worse; certainly more than CMU and Nebraska.
You can try to turn it into a michigan/ohio thing, but they were only mentioned, as they were the team who kept saying that is why Michigan beat them. The rest of the B1G didn't really matter, as UM was more talented than all the other teams.
He was suspended for being terminally stupid.