Oakland A's Relocating

RubinRock

RubinRock

Joined
Aug 17, 2020
Posts
12,693
Reaction score
16,278
Bookie:
$ 15,593.00
Lol at the organization officially announcing this over notes app. At 10:30 local time. After an ass kicking.
 
 
Whatever A's fans still exist are undoubtedly bailing on that franchise as of today. The franchise would be better off completely rebranding themselves in Vegas - drop the Athletics nickname and start over as if it was an expansion franchise.
 
Been coming a while. Everyone knew it would happen.
 
RP-29 said:
Whatever A's fans still exist are undoubtedly bailing on that franchise as of today. The franchise would be better off completely rebranding themselves in Vegas - drop the Athletics nickname and start over as if it was an expansion franchise.
Click to expand...
No, they’re one of the founding members of the AL and have a rich history.

The Raiders left for pretty well the same reasons and have had far less success this century than the A’s and didn’t rebrand
 
RP-29 said:
Whatever A's fans still exist are undoubtedly bailing on that franchise as of today. The franchise would be better off completely rebranding themselves in Vegas - drop the Athletics nickname and start over as if it was an expansion franchise.
Click to expand...
Won't happen. They've been the Athletics since 1901 and through moves from Philly to KC to Oakland.
 
RP-29 said:
Whatever A's fans still exist are undoubtedly bailing on that franchise as of today. The franchise would be better off completely rebranding themselves in Vegas - drop the Athletics nickname and start over as if it was an expansion franchise.
Click to expand...
Hope not. Great history and some of the best uni's.
 
Illustrious Potentate said:
No, they’re one of the founding members of the AL and have a rich history.

The Raiders left for pretty well the same reasons and have had far less success this century than the A’s and didn’t rebrand
Click to expand...
The Raiders have a much greater national following than the A's do. The average prospective Vegas fan isn't gonna care about the franchise's history; I think they're gonna care a lot more if the franchise is their own instead of their step-franchise.
 
So are the owners of the team gonna spend money now or nah?
 
RP-29 said:
The Raiders have a much greater national following than the A's do. The average prospective Vegas fan isn't gonna care about the franchise's history; I think they're gonna care a lot more if the franchise is their own instead of their step-franchise.
Click to expand...
There’s too much history there, and too much recent success.

Braves have been the Braves through 3 cities. A’s have been the A’s through 3 and hopefully soon to be 4 cities
 
Fuck the A's owners and fuck Oakland. Sad to see this happen to such a storied franchise.

That being said, I will not miss the Coliseum. Just a travesty of a stadium.
 
navamind said:
Fuck the A's owners and fuck Oakland. Sad to see this happen to such a storied franchise.

That being said, I will not miss the Coliseum. Just a travesty of a stadium.
Click to expand...
Hell, I remember it being called the worst stadium in the majors when I was a kid, like when Fulton County Stadium was still home of the Braves
 
rsw626 said:
Won't happen. They've been the Athletics since 1901 and through moves from Philly to KC to Oakland.
Click to expand...

I think that the team's most famous bat boy said it best about the team name.

hammer time GIF
 
Illustrious Potentate said:
There’s too much history there, and too much recent success.

Braves have been the Braves through 3 cities. A’s have been the A’s through 3 and hopefully soon to be 4 cities
Click to expand...
I understand the history. I'm taking the stance of an economic realist.

A decade ago, Las Vegas had zero major sports franchises. Locals took very well to their first new expansion Golden Knights they called their own and it has thrived. Like I said, the Raiders already had a very strong national following, so it wasn't difficult to draw attendance and support for that franchise from a national level (beginning with people traveling in to see games on Sunday). And unlike the Raiders that only have 8 or 9 home games to fill, the A's franchise is going to have 82 games in a now suddenly saturated market with not much initial interest from the locals. Getting the locals to go to games won't be as easy this time.
 
RP-29 said:
I understand the history. I'm taking the stance of an economic realist.

A decade ago, Las Vegas had zero major sports franchises. Locals took very well to their first new expansion Golden Knights they called their own and it has thrived. Like I said, the Raiders already had a very strong national following, so it wasn't difficult to draw attendance and support for that franchise from a national level (beginning with people traveling in to see games on Sunday). And unlike the Raiders that only have 8 or 9 home games to fill, the A's franchise is going to have 82 games in a now suddenly saturated market with not much initial interest from the locals. Getting the locals to go to games won't be as easy this time.
Click to expand...
A name change won’t make it any easier. Vegas is a destination city.

Really and truly, the best way to drum up local interest is to win, and the A’s tend to rebuild well and win above their paygrade. If they win, people will come regardless of name
 
RP-29 said:
The Raiders have a much greater national following than the A's do. The average prospective Vegas fan isn't gonna care about the franchise's history; I think they're gonna care a lot more if the franchise is their own instead of their step-franchise.
Click to expand...
I'd be surprised if they rebranded, but I suppose we'll see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top