- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 1,313
- Reaction score
- 90
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
Breaking the rules is cheating. You try to convince yourself if you need help sleeping at night.I support lying to the NCAA. This is not cheating.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Breaking the rules is cheating. You try to convince yourself if you need help sleeping at night.I support lying to the NCAA. This is not cheating.
MI is a member and helps run the NCAA. So you say MI is just trying to make a few people rich?This isn't a new opinion of mine. I already proved this earlier, it's been a relatively consistent opinion. The NCAA is a bad organization, it exists to make a few people rich while claiming to be for the small athlete. It regularly takes a stand on dumb issues while ignoring the actual problems within the sport(s)
Pipe down cheater. When you admit your own program cheated for DECADES -- your words hold no meaning. Saying - "everyone was doing it" when everyone wasn't paying players, doesn't mean you paid a penalty. CHEATER!!!You are so broken you can't understand what I am saying.
Quit deflecting ... it's not about my program cheating in the past and paying the penalty for it, it's about your cheating program that is going to pay the penalty for it. Stay on point, knucklehead.
I would contend that this is no different than what Michigan is accused of. Teams collecting the information in game for their own use is legal. As soon as they electronically transmit that to another team for use of a future opponent, that's pretty literally in person scouting of a future opponent and using electronic means to capture and share that information.What about it? As we all know they can be obtained through legal means like watching televised football games.
Were those signals obtained via "in-person" scouting and video taping a "future opponent"?
That's not alleged.
Not to mention Michigan likely weren't provided that from outside but released it themselves as yet another watch the birdie distraction.
We can be sure it was Michigan who blacked it out.
Sounds like everyone is breaking a bad rule.Breaking the rules is cheating. You try to convince yourself if you need help sleeping at night.
Which exact rule did others break?Sounds like everyone is breaking a bad rule.
The person leaking it has supposedly been working with Michigan/big10/NCAA and providing more than what's given here -- in the form of texts from coaches talking about said documents. Pretty hard evidence.
No...according to Sport Illustrated and a former coach.....According to "sources" from within the Michigan football program and posters on MGoBlue.
In person scouting of a future opponent.Which exact rule did others break?
Please show me that proof...In person scouting of a future opponent.
There isn't a more unlevel playing field than college football. That's why you see coaches using jobs at P5 D1 programs at stepping stones to get to one of the schools where they have all the advantages.Isnt having an uneven playing field an actual problem in the sport?
I like how a laminated sheet of paper has turned into "binders"...as if Michigan's laminated sheet wasn't identical to these google docs, just with better graphics.![]()
![]()
Other schools have fucking printer paper with some shit on it while Michigan has thick ass binders on every other school with laminated sheets of all their signs.
Please show me that proof...
I would contend that this is no different than what Michigan is accused of. Teams collecting the information in game for their own use is legal. As soon as they electronically transmit that to another team for use of a future opponent, that's pretty literally in person scouting of a future opponent and using electronic means to capture and share that information.
Michigan hired 3rd party people unassociated with the team to do the scouting. The 1 instance that is in question is the CMU/Stallions tape.
Yes. this is what I was talking about earlier. Who the fuck even is this guy??Also, the "how did stallions fund this??!?!?!?!?!?!" outrage -- turns out to be more hilarious than imagined
![]()
A vacuum cleaner side hustle.
Michigan hired no one, Stallions hired people. And the NCAA doesn't set the requirement that money has to be exchanged. It's simply "working with". IE, if another team gives you that information it collected in person, you are most defiantly breaking the intent of the rule.Not trying to join this pissing match. But...if you hire people to do scouting for your team, they are definitely associated with the team.