More Michigan Cheating



What about it? As we all know they can be obtained through legal means like watching televised football games.

Were those signals obtained via "in-person" scouting and video taping a "future opponent"?

That's not alleged.

Not to mention Michigan likely weren't provided that from outside but released it themselves as yet another watch the birdie distraction.
We can be sure it was Michigan who blacked it out.
 
This isn't a new opinion of mine. I already proved this earlier, it's been a relatively consistent opinion. The NCAA is a bad organization, it exists to make a few people rich while claiming to be for the small athlete. It regularly takes a stand on dumb issues while ignoring the actual problems within the sport(s)
MI is a member and helps run the NCAA. So you say MI is just trying to make a few people rich?

Isnt having an uneven playing field an actual problem in the sport?
 
You are so broken you can't understand what I am saying.

Quit deflecting ... it's not about my program cheating in the past and paying the penalty for it, it's about your cheating program that is going to pay the penalty for it. Stay on point, knucklehead.
Pipe down cheater. When you admit your own program cheated for DECADES -- your words hold no meaning. Saying - "everyone was doing it" when everyone wasn't paying players, doesn't mean you paid a penalty. CHEATER!!!

Jennifer Aniston Friends GIF
 
What about it? As we all know they can be obtained through legal means like watching televised football games.

Were those signals obtained via "in-person" scouting and video taping a "future opponent"?

That's not alleged.

Not to mention Michigan likely weren't provided that from outside but released it themselves as yet another watch the birdie distraction.
We can be sure it was Michigan who blacked it out.
I would contend that this is no different than what Michigan is accused of. Teams collecting the information in game for their own use is legal. As soon as they electronically transmit that to another team for use of a future opponent, that's pretty literally in person scouting of a future opponent and using electronic means to capture and share that information.

Michigan hired 3rd party people unassociated with the team to do the scouting. The 1 instance that is in question is the CMU/Stallions tape.
 
The person leaking it has supposedly been working with Michigan/big10/NCAA and providing more than what's given here -- in the form of texts from coaches talking about said documents. Pretty hard evidence.

According to "sources" from within the Michigan football program and posters on MGoBlue.
 
:pound: :pound: :pound: Other schools have fucking printer paper with some shit on it while Michigan has thick ass binders on every other school with laminated sheets of all their signs.
 
Isnt having an uneven playing field an actual problem in the sport?
There isn't a more unlevel playing field than college football. That's why you see coaches using jobs at P5 D1 programs at stepping stones to get to one of the schools where they have all the advantages.

You think Ohio State and Rutgers are on a level playing field? Rutgers lost like 75 million last year on athletics. :pound:

  • According to documents filed by the university to the NCAA, and reported by USA Today, Rutgers spent $118 million on athletics, yet generated only $45 million in revenue. Students and taxpayers are on the hook for covering a $73 million deficit. Nearly 30,000 students have already been assessed a $400 "athletics fee."
 
:pound: :pound: :pound: Other schools have fucking printer paper with some shit on it while Michigan has thick ass binders on every other school with laminated sheets of all their signs.
I like how a laminated sheet of paper has turned into "binders"...as if Michigan's laminated sheet wasn't identical to these google docs, just with better graphics.
 
I would contend that this is no different than what Michigan is accused of. Teams collecting the information in game for their own use is legal. As soon as they electronically transmit that to another team for use of a future opponent, that's pretty literally in person scouting of a future opponent and using electronic means to capture and share that information.

Michigan hired 3rd party people unassociated with the team to do the scouting. The 1 instance that is in question is the CMU/Stallions tape.

Not trying to join this pissing match. But...if you hire people to do scouting for your team, they are definitely associated with the team.
 
Also, the "how did stallions fund this??!?!?!?!?!?!" outrage -- turns out to be more hilarious than imagined


F-WgBR2XIAAWEAw


A vacuum cleaner side hustle.
 

Breaking news: coaches talk to each other. This has been happening for decades. It's one thing to be doing something everyone in your conference is doing. It's another to do what michigan was doing with Stalions. Apples and oranges, amigo.
 
Also, the "how did stallions fund this??!?!?!?!?!?!" outrage -- turns out to be more hilarious than imagined


F-WgBR2XIAAWEAw


A vacuum cleaner side hustle.
Yes. this is what I was talking about earlier. Who the fuck even is this guy??
 
Not trying to join this pissing match. But...if you hire people to do scouting for your team, they are definitely associated with the team.
Michigan hired no one, Stallions hired people. And the NCAA doesn't set the requirement that money has to be exchanged. It's simply "working with". IE, if another team gives you that information it collected in person, you are most defiantly breaking the intent of the rule.
 
Back
Top