again.. people made fun of ou.. were strong at the start of the 2000s.. after winning it all with Blake's roster.. they were known for getting beat in the BCS... y'all were literally ran off the field early vs SC.. We all know how much Bob obsessed with the RRS every year.. (he thought the bigger beatdown he would out recruit UT for players..that still ended up going to UT)
They do, but they are irrelevant to the discussion. They are terrible and have been for decades. They have great dance girls and pretty uniforms. That's it.
Yes and no. Sure, $$$ drives all this. But, I was mostly looking at which teams are going to be better on the field in years to come. I can see OU and UT being better than USC and UO. West Coast, travel, better competition, disappearing high school ball in Cali, etc. UW is only in the conversation due to recency bias, and their coach is now gone. We know coaches drive how good a team is.
lol nobody outside you cares about that cause nobody even remembers your last championship.. lol UT still had the last title win and still were the last to play for a title..
Are you the best team in the 2000's or not, like @ELTEXAN said?
Best Team...EVER
1:17 left, says hello
so does Kansas....
You calculated wrong because your school doesn’t trach you to count. We were tied second in wins through 2009 and had the second best win% outright. Dunce.
I'll leave it alone
You should since you just caught either not being able to count or trying to pull a fast one. Either way: me right; you wrong. Again. And forever.
Exactamundo,.
Don't be bringing facts into this.
...and you don't have to win championships to be the financially most valuable.
The wrong facts
NIL and the hire of Sark has gotten UT to win a conference championship and make their first CFP in year 3 of Sark's tenure.. UM is valuable too and just won the CFP.. not sure what your angle is... tosu is also one of the most valuable schools too.. they haven't won a title since 2014.. but they are always contenders.
