- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 41,883
- Reaction score
- 50,579
- Bookie:
- $ 10,650.00




Buddy, the 80’s were before my time, I’m a 90’s kid, but there were single team owner-drivers that were winning races and competing for and winning championships.It's not a gimmick. It's an attempt to make the product on the track more exciting, interesting, and competitive. Because once upon a time, the team who could afford to hire 250 engineers, skirt the rule book, and put NASA-quality parts in every system of the car won the race and the championship. Usually by landslides. Races weren't so much won by the driver on the track on raceday...they were run by the shop on Tuesday. Dale Sr, Darrell, Rusty, or Richard driving to the checkers was a mere formality in many cases.
The current format absolutely rewards domination. Moreso than before. If a driver/team can rattle off numerous wins throughout the season, the bonus they get come playoff time is tremendously difficult for the competition to overcome. To add to the intrigue, you don't even have to win races to gain a playoff advantage, because winning stages earns you a bonus point as well. So the races within the races (stages) adds a very healthy amount of intrigue that makes some of these long races more interesting.
Also, we weren't robbed of shit. The best championship battle? How about a tie breaker between Tony Stewart and Carl Edwards in 2011? How about nowadays, a team/driver has to perform consistently throughout the ENTIRE season, up to and including the final race, to bring home a championship. NASCAR has a difficult task of having to compete for viewers with traditional stick and ball fans. What does your average fan want to see? A contest that goes down to the wire. A contest that requires every game (race) to be competed and fought for. A climactic ending where yes, indeed - a bad game, a bad night, a bad race does in fact spoil the season, no matter how good it was. The New England Patriots went undefeated, and went to the Superbowl in a season where everyone thought they had it locked. And no doubt, they were still the better team, even in that Superbowl. But they had to play the game, and they had to perform in order to take home the Lombardi, and Eli Manning and the Giants had something to say about that. And the sports world LOVED it. NASCAR won't please EVERYONE, but they need to please as many as they possibly can, and the way to do that is to make every lap of every race matter as much as possible. They have done a pretty outstanding job, given the difficulty of the difference between racing and stick/ball sports, in doing that.
In the 90's and early 2000's fans writ large complained about the boring nature of "points racing". Drivers going out there being happy with a 9th place finish. Wins weren't so much a big deal, just consistently be "above average" and you are ok points wise. It was incredibly boring on a week to week basis. I can't tell you how happy I am that those days are gone. They sucked. Welcome to another outrageously long 1.5 mile oval that we already know only one of maybe 3 drivers has a chance to win, and low and behold the winner will win by 12 seconds with a grand total of 8 cars on the lead lap. Whooooooo that was exciting! But some (trust me -- only SOME) ate it up because the winner was their beloved Wallace, Waltrip, or Earnhardt. Yawn. Garbage.
If you don't think the current format hasn't produced infinitely better racing, more intrigue, more drama, more "can't take a race off" type of product, then there is no way you're an actual racing fan. You're a "i want my driver to dominate and blast the competition" fan, but you aren't a racing fan. It's not possible. NASCAR racing over the past several years and gotten increasingly better. If they could just stop going overboard with road courses and infields, it'd be as close to perfect as you can hope for in this age. And yet there's still curmudgeons here like yourself who inexplicably beg for the days of the NASCAR nap to return. Pish motherfkn posh on that.
Comparing auto racing to stick and ball sports is a non starter dumb argument.
It’s a gimmick. It’s Mickey Mouse bullshit that never should have been allowed to be put in place. It makes NASCAR look bad to the rest of the racing world and rightfully so.
Already said stages are fine.
The Stewart-Edward’s deal wasn’t legit, Stewart never should have had a shot at a title and I say this as a Tony Stewart fan. That was Carl’s title, same as 2008. The dumb format lead to a great driver and fan favorite’s early retirement.
NASCAR’s main problem is their lack of personality from the drivers. Even Harvick and the Busch brothers have toned it down in their old age.
And it also didn’t help that for most of the 21st century, the most popular driver was far from the best, and also wasn’t much on the personality front.
You can tweak the points system to give more points to wins, but winning at Talladega, and then averaging a 25th place finish in the first 26 races and then going on a run in the playoffs shouldn’t crown anyone champion.
The full season format is used in every other racing league in the world for a reason. It’s common sense.
Trim the playoff field down to 5, determine the drivers by regular season points, and go back to a chase format from there, and I have less of an issue.
It’s a joke, it’s a gimmick. It’s Mickey Mouse bullshit. Chase Elliott got a Mickey Mouse title in 2020. It’s likely he’s gonna get screwed out of a legit title this year.
And dominating a season means nothing of you have a flat tire in the last race of the season, since it’s the only race that really even matters now. 35 wins and a second place finish on the season.
I’m glad Matt Crafton exposed the retarded system when he went winless and won the Truck title a few years back. Since I place zero value on Harvick’s 2014 “title” since it’s fake, I wish Ryan Newman could have won the first playoff by finishing 8th while the other 3 had problems