- Joined
- Sep 14, 2020
- Posts
- 7,269
- Reaction score
- 6,039
- Bookie:
- $ 12,463.00

But haven't there been two 11-1 P5 non champs get in?
I believe that's true. Alabama once and Ohio State once
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But haven't there been two 11-1 P5 non champs get in?
Hold on what does @droider think?What you think, what I think, what occupant thinks, what hammer thinks what day man thinks what droider thinks and so on would deviate so a committee with condaleeza rice may have a different feel and opinions than one with tyrone willingham
So 11-1 can get you in if you have the right name on the jersey.I believe that's true. Alabama once and Ohio State once
So 11-1 can get you in if you have the right name on the jersey.
Cincy is ranked above OU and WF.I don't think Cincy is getting a ton love for the win against ND.
I'm not so sure about that. I think your bucknuts would be in the game throughout...unless they turned the ball over a lot.So I'm not sure why people are complaining about the rankings especially in the first week. If UGA and Ohio St played today, Ohio St would get skulldragged
Win out and I believe Oklahoma and/or Wake Forest are in ... one loss torpedoes their chances. You shouldn't deny an undefeated P5 Team.Cincy is ranked above OU and WF.
Both OU and WF are undefeated and have wins over AT LEAST five P5 schools.
Cincy has beaten two P5 schools.
I honestly can't think of another reason you could offer that would substantiate being ranked above OU/WF.
Cincy is ranked above OU and WF.
Both OU and WF are undefeated and have wins over AT LEAST five P5 schools.
Cincy has beaten two P5 schools.
I honestly can't think of another reason you could offer that would substantiate being ranked above OU/WF.
That knife cuts both ways and Ohio State HAS benefited from it. And if you think committee members don't take the names on jerseys into consideration when two teams are equal, then I've got some ocean front property in El Paso I'll sell you. And there are 1,000 ways to justify it as long as criteria shift i.e. the 13th data point made a difference in 2014 according to the committee but not in subsequent years when it benefited Bama and Ohio State. Flannigan's Finagling Factor.It depends on what the rest of the field does. Ohio State went 12-1 in 2018 and got left out. The name on their jersey didn't save them.
I never claimed 11-1 keeps you out. I pointed out how the irony about favoritism towards brand name schools, when the only 12-1 P5 champ to ever be left out was Ohio State, one of the biggest brands in the sport.
Cinci has the better coach obviouslyWould Cincinnati beat 2017 UCF?
That knife cuts both ways and Ohio State HAS benefited from it. And if you think committee members don't take the names on jerseys into consideration when two teams are equal, then I've got some ocean front property in El Paso I'll sell you. And there are 1,000 ways to justify it as long as criteria shift i.e. the 13th data point made a difference in 2014 according to the committee but not in subsequent years when it benefited Bama and Ohio State. Flannigan's Finagling Factor.
Can't blame the committee though. That is what we wanted...humans to be able to look at things besides just what a computer program spit out like the BCS. We wanted a fudge factor allowed. We got it.
Win out and I believe Oklahoma and/or Wake Forest are in ... one loss torpedoes their chances. You shouldn't deny an undefeated P5 Team.
Baylor/TCU
And I acknowledged such as I stated below. That how it was designed. Strict criteria that HAD to be followed wasn't the desire. They wanted wiggle room to allow for circumstances. And where do you think that wiggle room is used?Comparing apples to oranges. Every season has a different set of circumstances. What season exactly were Ohio State and Alabama bailed out by the names on their Jersey? Who should have made it instead?
And I acknowledged such as I stated below. That how it was designed. Strict criteria that HAD to be followed wasn't the desire. They wanted wiggle room to allow for circumstances. And where do you think that wiggle room is used?
"Can't blame the committee though. That is what we wanted...humans to be able to look at things besides just what a computer program spit out like the BCS. We wanted a fudge factor allowed. We got it."
Neither were Ohio State in 2016 or Alabama in 2017. One got whipped 31-0 in the semi and the other one won a natty without playing in their CCG. Two extremes. Spewing the 13th data point justification doesn't hold water IMHO. Just say we felt Team X is better and leave it at that.They weren't 12-1.