More Michigan Cheating

If they had found evidence in one investigation, which led to the start of another investigation -- that would be called A CONNECTION. It'd be two completely separate investigations, but the connection would be the evidence found in one case being used in a separate case.
Dude I don't know why this pisses you off so much, it doesn't change anything. No, it would not mean the two investigations are connected. If they were connected, that would mean the NCAA and FBI are jointly working together. They're not. If the FBI found something, turned it over to a legal group to handle it with the NCAA, it would still very much mean the FBI's investigation is not connected in any way to the NCAA's investigation.
 
My high school team changed our signals multiple times a year. You think a college program can't. :facepalm:

College programs already change their signals on a week to week basis. They will change who is sending in the real signs. They will change what the indicator is. That is why they have multiple people on the sideline sending signals in or in some teams cases, holding signs up with pictures.
Then why was Stalions doing what he was doing? Why was he spending tens of thousands of dollars every season to do what he was doing if it gave michigan no advantage whatsoever?
 
I just love seeing how delusional Michigan fans are right now after years of tattoo talk. And I didn’t forget it was a Michigan fan calling for the expulsion of Nebraska because of football struggles many of which are the same ones Michigan must have really felt in order to cheat on such a massive scale.
Let's be real -- Michigan hasn't ever had the struggles Nebraska has had. In an era where CFB sends everyone to bowl games -- Nebraska hasn't been to one in like 5-6 years. BUT -- you do have a great women's volleyball team
 
Dude I don't know why this pisses you off so much, it doesn't change anything. No, it would not mean the two investigations are connected. If they were connected, that would mean the NCAA and FBI are jointly working together. They're not. If the FBI found something, turned it over to a legal group to handle it with the NCAA, it would still very much mean the FBI's investigation is not connected in any way to the NCAA's investigation.
If one case starts because of evidence from another case -- that is called a connection.

I will break it down simply for you -- you kill jim harbaugh and leave your dna behind. They then find your dna in tuscaloosa in the missing person case for Nick Saban. Two completely different cases, handled separately, connected by evidence.

Unless you are trying to say Matt Weiss's hard drives are not evidence in his cyber crime case.
 
If one case starts because of evidence from another case -- that is called a connection.

I will break it down simply for you -- you kill jim harbaugh and leave your dna behind. They then find your dna in tuscaloosa in the missing person case for Nick Saban. Two completely different cases, handled separately, connected by evidence.

Unless you are trying to say Matt Weiss's hard drives are not evidence in his cyber crime case.
See the problem with your example is that I would be a person of interest in both cases so they would obviously be connected. Nobody is saying Weiss is also being investigated for cheating, because he's not, hence why there is no connection. Evidence of cheating is not evidence of Weiss's federal computer crimes. It has literally nothing at all to do with his federal computer crimes. That was a horrible attempt to come up with an example by you.
 
Then why was Stalions doing what he was doing? Why was he spending tens of thousands of dollars every season to do what he was doing if it gave michigan no advantage whatsoever?
It was his job. The same job someone has on OSU. The same job someone has on PSU. The same job someone has on every team in CFB. EVERY TEAM tries to steal signs. This guy took it a completely different level.

And obviously after reading about the guy -- he wasn't all there, IMO. Who writes a 650 page anything, let alone 650 pages on sign stealing?!?!
 
See the problem with your example is that I would be a person of interest in both cases so they would obviously be connected. Nobody is saying Weiss is also being investigated for cheating, because he's not, hence why there is no connection. Evidence of cheating is not evidence of Weiss's federal computer crimes. It has literally nothing at all to do with his federal computer crimes. That was a horrible attempt to come up with an example by you.
The EVIDENCE would be the connection. The hard drive would be evidence in the Matt Weiss cyber case. The hard drive would be evidence in the Sign Stealing coaches case. CONNECTION.
 
It's been confirmed that the two investigations aren't related in that the cheating scandal has nothing to do with Weiss and what he was doing (which honestly is sounding really fucked up). It's not been confirmed that the information regarding the hard drives didn't get discovered during the Weiss investigation.
This is the most likely scenario. While investigating Weiss, they found the other information.
 
The EVIDENCE would be the connection. The hard drive would be evidence in the Matt Weiss cyber case. The hard drive would be evidence in the Sign Stealing coaches case. CONNECTION.
LMAO the hard drive itself isn't evidence in the cheating case or the FBI case you dumbass. What was on the hard drive is evidence. Hard drives can contain all sort of different information involving tons of unrelated things. Holy hell you cannot be this stupid.
 
Ahh yes, mgoblog user that's been active for less than a year has some super secret information!

F9dNEyjWoAAUNt5

LOL he's been a member on the site for nearly 12 years dumbass.

1698430966062.png
 

Attachments

  • 1698430862112.png
    1698430862112.png
    19.4 KB · Views: 1
I'm not sure that really changes the point....this isn't some well connected source. You quoted a random 4 sentence post of a random user in a larger thread. This is nonsense.
Deflect! Deflect! LOL you fucking dumbass.
 
Deflect! Deflect! LOL you fucking fumbass.
There's no deflections. You just quoted a random message board post of an unknown person with no credentials or history of insider information and claimed "MGoBlog message boards are diving deep into the allegations that michigan staffers hacked an OSU employee's login information"

You're getting desperate in your attempts at justifying your team sucking
 
There's no deflections. You just quoted a random message board post of an unknown person with no credentials or history of insider information and claimed "MGoBlog message boards are diving deep into the allegations that michigan staffers hacked an OSU employee's login information"

You're getting desperate in your attempts at justifying your team sucking
LOL you tried pointing out he had been active less than a year as if that was an important detail (even though you were wrong, as usual). This thread is just nonstop embarrassment for you LOL
 
The whole "once we’re the champs again" is what made me laugh. When would that be ... 1948? He could have said, "co-champs" if he meant 1997. All that would have been before he was alive, so there's that.
Sure is odd he had the chance to deny that they had knowingly been cheating, but instead his response was "it is what it is".
 
It was his job. The same job someone has on OSU. The same job someone has on PSU. The same job someone has on every team in CFB. EVERY TEAM tries to steal signs. This guy took it a completely different level.

And obviously after reading about the guy -- he wasn't all there, IMO. Who writes a 650 page anything, let alone 650 pages on sign stealing?!?!
Yeah the information from the hard drive proves that other michigan coaches not only accessed but maintained the hard drive that had the Stalions information. It wasn't some rogue job by Stalions, they obviously knew.
 
Back
Top