- Joined
- Sep 24, 2020
- Posts
- 7,042
- Reaction score
- 4,062
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
AGAIN -- since it is this season's class, which one of the recruits that you haven't signed yet has helped you guys this season?It's this season's class.
AGAIN -- since it is this season's class, which one of the recruits that you haven't signed yet has helped you guys this season?It's this season's class.
AGAIN -- since it is this season's class, which one of the recruits that you haven't signed yet has helped you guys this season?
You are a mess.I said Oregon is recruiting better than Michigan. Do you even present tense, bro?
You are a mess.
What makes you think you would beat them? But, I am not sure what makes you think you would be favored against them on a neutral field.
I said -- Michigan and Oregon recruit very comparably. An Oregon fan is the one who said Oregon for sure recruits better than Michigan because of the last 1 or 2 years?!?!
The committee is telling you that they are the best 1 loss team. You are the one trying to argue with them.
I was agreeing with you. The "on paper" talent is very comparable
He was upset with me because I pointed out how much better Lanning is recruiting than Harbaugh.
Lanning's 2023 and 2024 class has been better than Harbaugh's. I'm not sure I would say "much" better but it's definitely been better on paper.
They are well behind Oregon both years.
You are literally talking about a single recruiting class and then trying to say 2024 (as in NEXT YEAR) is somehow, this year's recruiting class.says the guy living in the past
You are literally talking about a single recruiting class and then trying to say 2024 (as in NEXT YEAR) is somehow, this year's recruiting class.
I am not sure what your point is.The committee is telling you that they are the best 1 loss team. You are the one trying to argue with them.
So, you are basically saying the eye test favors Oregon even though they haven't beaten a single ranked opponent.Exactly. I'm sure the conversation went like this:
Committee Member #1 - Texas has a better resume than Oregon, should we move them over Oregon?
Committee Chairman: Does a single person in this room think Texas would be favored over Oregon on a neutral field?
***Crickets***
Committee Chairman: Ok so we're keeping Oregon at 6
Do your parents make you wear a helmet to leave the house? You are a train wreck.When have I ever said this year?
This seasons class is 2024.
This seasons class is 2024
It's this season's class.
I am not sure what your point is.
I don't think the committee has it right.
I laid out some of the reasons why.
Duckboy responded, but didn't really address some of the issues, IMO.
I acknowledged what he said and pointed out a few other things and asked if he would address those.
So, what's your point. Seems like we are having a civil discussion on Oregon v. the other 1 loss teams.
Do your parents make you wear a helmet to leave the house? You are a train wreck.
There are a lot of people who would favor Bama and probably Texas over Oregon on a neutral field, primarily because they don't have a single good win.
So, you are basically saying the eye test favors Oregon even though they haven't beaten a single ranked opponent.