


Once you get into the field the only adjustment you make is to your aiming point. If you hit high and right, you just aim low and left next time. There is no time to work on the scope. BTW a friend of mine handed me a .45 of his one day when we were target shooting and the bastard loosened the rear sight ... could not hit shit nor even miss right.yeah… I’m with this. Again, I’m not a shooter so I’m not in a position to say one way or the other. To me it’s just implausible. To me you don’t waste a shot bc you don’t know if you’re gonna get a second or third shot. The rifle was oswalds. He knew it. In some ways it’s an extension of him. You don’t waste a shot.
However, I’m not a sniper. Would a sniper want the luxury of being able to adjust for such things as wind if they BELIEVED they’d have an opportunity for a second shot? I guess that’s why I threw it out for discussion and tagged those two posters.
To us the lineup look fixed and is definitely improper but during the times in question that was legally acceptable and very common. I think it was 1967 when SCOTUS first ruled that the arrested person had the right to have an attorney present for the lineup and witnesses it.I’m sure there was a requirement for a proper lineup, but what other suspects were there. They very quickly felt they had this case by the balls. I’m not sure why you don’t bring some other prisoners in for the lineup to fill it out instead of cops.