Poll *WOULD*? Bama Oregon TX

Would be left out?

  • Bama left out

  • Oregon left out

  • Texas left out

Results are only viewable after voting.
DayButtAssMans’s said:
Also, gonna ask again, if this scenario happens except Oregon loses, is it Texas or Bama? Find it funny and appropriate that Bama is the given here, but all the arguments seem to rely on the head to head of Texas and Bama. Everyone just knows that Alabama isn't getting left out as an SEC champion, but do you want to argue that's not the case if there's just room for one of them?
Click to expand...
Doesn't matter. Sub Washington for Oregon, doesn't matter. Winner of OU/UW is in.
 
Jon Deaux said:
I didn't get anything wrong.
Click to expand...
factually wrong. Tie breaker couldn’t kick in until after this past weekend. But I repeat myself to you.

IMG_8577.jpeg
 
michaeljordan_fan said:
How are they not? They pick the best teams, and when it's close they go to the other criteria.
Click to expand...
Don't know this for sure, but I believe the "eye test" isn't in their guide lines.
 
michaeljordan_fan said:
You seem to be missing the point that a "tiebreaker" only kicks in when there is a tie.

The committee doesn't think there's a tie.
Click to expand...
It kicks in unless CLEARLY better. So, now you’ve taken to lying.
 
michaeljordan_fan said:
Oregon has a better SOS (52) than Michigan (55) or Georgia (56)
Click to expand...
We aren't talking about that enough either. Michigan gets to coast in with a CCG against fucking Iowa. Georgia has to play Alabama, Washington has to play Oregon. Everyone's expecting chaos... But Michigan's getting ready for the team with the good punter.
 
Jon Deaux said:
Don't know this for sure, but I believe the "eye test" isn't in their guide lines.
Click to expand...

The eye test is the first test.

Everything else is when the eye test determines that the teams are "comparable".
 
I always felt that it should be Conference Winners in Iowa, Louisville and Oklahoma State all win ... who gets left out?
 
ELTEXAN said:
It kicks in unless CLEARLY better. So, now you’ve taken to lying.
Click to expand...

Oregon is clearly better. If you don't believe me, ask the committee who keeps ranking Oregon higher.
 
Voltaire said:
I always felt that it should be Conference Winners in Iowa, Louisville and Oklahoma State all win ... who gets left out?
Click to expand...
The fuck do you mean who gets left out? All the teams that lost to those teams, for starters.
 
michaeljordan_fan said:
Oregon is clearly better. If you don't believe me, ask the committee who keeps ranking Oregon higher.
Click to expand...
Higher ranking doesn’t imply clearly better for the purposes of ignoring explicit guidelines. Again, you’re either purposefully obtuse or outright stupid. I’m now leaning toward the latter
 
ELTEXAN said:
Higher ranking doesn’t imply clearly better for the purposes of ignoring explicit guidelines. Again, you’re either purposefully obtuse or outright stupid. I’m now leaning toward the latter
Click to expand...

2-week avy bet on Oregon being ranked higher this week?
 
michaeljordan_fan said:
2-week avy bet on Oregon being ranked higher this week?
Click to expand...
Why would I bet on someone else’s opinions and biases? I feel like I’ve said this to you exactly before. You ARE fucking outright stupid.
 
michaeljordan_fan said:
Oregon has a better SOS (52) than Michigan (55) or Georgia (56)
Click to expand...
They are not being compared to those schools. Oregon is being compared to Texas and Bama. The SOS isn’t close there
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top