What If JFK Wasn’t a Conspiracy

on one hand you say “forensic evidence doesn’t prove anything” but then you say “the fact that there’s no OTHER forensic evidence is proof there was a coverup”. Do you see the inconsistency there?



Not at all, the evidence is going to show what they want it to show. The fact his prints were there proves absolutely nothing, he worked there.
 
Who was this eyewitness and how come i've never heard that before?

there were a number of people who saw a man and a rifle in the 6th floor window. Each of them had their issues regarding positively identifying Oswald. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously inaccurate. That’s why forensic evidence is more reliable.

For example, do you know who billy lovelady is?
 
So, you're saying that everyone who made a statement had their information taken and what they said and who they said it to was put in the official report and they were all called to testify? Or... are there some people who gave a statement that went against the narrative that were ignored and nothing they said was added to the any report and they were never called to testify?

you made a statement that 10 people reported smelling gun powder. Ok… who are they? Let’s examine those statements. Why is that controversial?
 
Not at all, the evidence is going to show what they want it to show. The fact his prints were there proves absolutely nothing, he worked there.

so that fact that his prints were on THE box that the sniper rested the rifle on “proves nothing”?

not just ANY box. THE box that the sniper rested the rifle on


1627516067492.jpeg

1627516869572.jpeg

Those aren’t just ANY boxes that ANY co-worker would have left fingerprints on during the course of working there. These are THE boxes the shooter used to make the shot. They were placed next to that window solely to aid in taking that shot. They weren’t placed there during the ordinary course of working there.

How does Oswald prints get on THOSE boxes? Again, not just ANY boxes… THOSE boxes. Oh… and NOBODY else’s prints are on THOSE boxes.

That proves “nothing”?
 
Last edited:
so that fact that his prints were on THE box that the sniper rested the rifle on “proves nothing”?

not just ANY box. THE box that the sniper rested the rifle on


View attachment 37129

View attachment 37130

Those aren’t just ANY boxes that ANY co-worker would have left fingerprints on during the course of working there. These are THE boxes the shooter used to make the shot. They were placed next to that window solely to aid in taking that shot. They weren’t placed there during the ordinary course of working there.

How does Oswald prints get on THOSE boxes? Again, not just ANY boxes… THOSE boxes. Oh… and NOBODY else’s prints are on THOSE boxes.

That proves “nothing”?
Not to mention on of them palm prints pulled super clear and stark. And it was on a part of the box you would never have your palm if you were just moving a box (workers there confirm that Oswald had no part in moving any boxes on that floor before he obviously moved these to erect his hide.
 
Not to mention on of them palm prints pulled super clear and stark. And it was on a part of the box you would never have your palm if you were just moving a box (workers there confirm that Oswald had no part in moving any boxes on that floor before he obviously moved these to erect his hide.

great points.

I’ll add these other points but I recognize that they are more anecdotal.

Oswald arrived at work much earlier than usual that day and although he was given lots of work to do he hadn’t filled a single book order all morning. Instead, he spent almost all of the morning on the 6th floor in that area of the window which was really a seldom used area that was primarily storage.
 
Last edited:
Not at all, the evidence is going to show what they want it to show. The fact his prints were there proves absolutely nothing, he worked there.
The evidence is going to show what they (the government) want it to show….did I do that right?
 
I'll keep being your play toy but can y'all be a little less condescending? Thanks

Y'all know anything about this?


1627521973594.png
 
What if Oswald being the lone assassin is the conspiracy theory and the CIA was able to convince most Americans that the story was true?
 
Another thing I have always wondered is why the "Magic" bullet even though it went through Kennedy, through Connally's chest, wrist and into his leg was found in very good condition but the bullet that hit Kennedy's head exploded on impact and all that was ever found were fragments.

That means either there were different types of bullets used or there were two different guns as I believe the casings found were all the same, it kinda makes one wonder.
 
What if Oswald being the lone assassin is the conspiracy theory and the CIA was able to convince most Americans that the story was true?

what do you mean? I don’t follow?
 
Another thing I have always wondered is why the "Magic" bullet even though it went through Kennedy, through Connally's chest, wrist and into his leg was found in very good condition but the bullet that hit Kennedy's head exploded on impact and all that was ever found were fragments.

That means either there were different types of bullets used or there were two different guns as I believe the casings found were all the same, it kinda makes one wonder.
That doesn’t mean that exclusively. It could.

It could also mean the magic bullet did some one in a million thing and the one that came up against hard skull did what most do and came to pieces.

I was HUGE on the magic bullet and bullets don’t change direction in air like that. This was a huge piece for me. Then they were able to better analyze the situation and use computer modeling and found they were off in how both men were positioned. Combined with that was I saw the ballistics test with same bullet, bodies with ballistic gel and it coming out the same way. (Sorry I didn’t mention it earlier @batchaps4me ….but I remember that show too. Something like History Channel).
 
Did you know they did a parafin test on Oswald and it came back negative.
 
That doesn’t mean that exclusively. It could.

It could also mean the magic bullet did some one in a million thing and the one that came up against hard skull did what most do and came to pieces.

I was HUGE on the magic bullet and bullets don’t change direction in air like that. This was a huge piece for me. Then they were able to better analyze the situation and use computer modeling and found they were off in how both men were positioned. Combined with that was I saw the ballistics test with same bullet, bodies with ballistic gel and it coming out the same way. (Sorry I didn’t mention it earlier @batchaps4me ….but I remember that show too. Something like History Channel).



Did you know that gangsters and assassins back in the 60's would hollow out a bullets head and fill it with liquid Mercury to make it explode on impact?
 
what do you mean? I don’t follow?
Seems a simple enough premise. The physical and forensic evidence did not lead to one logical conclusion at the time (or now) so the mind melders at the CIA were able to spin it so that the LHO/lone gunman theory would become the prevailing narrative and here we are.

Just tossing darts at the board for shits and giggles really :noidea:
 
ok. Fair enough.

sorry.

what is this document? Where did it come from? Where did you get it?



I believe it's obvious what it is.
Why does that matter?
Why does that matter?

If you doubt it's authenticity look it up and disprove it. You'll be able to find it.
 
That doesn’t mean that exclusively. It could.

It could also mean the magic bullet did some one in a million thing and the one that came up against hard skull did what most do and came to pieces.

I was HUGE on the magic bullet and bullets don’t change direction in air like that. This was a huge piece for me. Then they were able to better analyze the situation and use computer modeling and found they were off in how both men were positioned. Combined with that was I saw the ballistics test with same bullet, bodies with ballistic gel and it coming out the same way. (Sorry I didn’t mention it earlier @batchaps4me ….but I remember that show too. Something like History Channel).
I've always been fascinated by this but never really dug into it. I've always been on the fence on this while thing (probably because I've never dug in). I listen to a lot of true crime stuff mostly on possibly wrongfully convicted people. Is it without a doubt reliable the position corrections that made the magic bullet more feasible are true? I can't remember exactly what the updated position of the guy in front was but I remember it seeming odd.
 
Back
Top