- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 6,521
- Reaction score
- 14,524
- Bookie:
- $ 13,200.00




Osborne has the better body of work. Osborne had the better CFB coaching career.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uh...Entire resume has always been more important than heads up. That’s why Ohio State was still ranked ahead of Purdue that year Purdue beat them by 30. Take a non homer stance, please. I just wanna see if you’re capable of doing it.Whelp.....looks like Tom's gonna swamp Barry Switzer in this one. Probably has as much to do with hating OU as anything else because if that isn't the reason then I don't want to ever read another !@#$%^& post on here about how one team is better than another team because they beat them heads up. Winning games against other teams apparently isn't as important as the losing team's "entire body of work".![]()
You're getting as tiresome as El Jexan with that "homerism" crap you pull every time you see someone's comments that you disagree with. Jeez. Barry buried Tom Osborne's ass head to head and it didn't have anything to do with one program being on probation or down or whatever the excuse du jour may be. Barry just flat out coached him. Period. If that doesn't make him a better coach then beating someone simply doesn't count in your book. You hate OU; we get it. But you're about as credible on anything to do with Oklahoma as I am on anything to do with Oregon. I have my prejudices too. We all do. But in this case it's pretty obvious that anytime Switzer and Osborne lined up against each other it was going to be Switzer getting carried off on the shoulders of his players. It happened 12 times out of 17 games. But Osborne was a better coach. Sheesh.Uh...Entire resume has always been more important than heads up. That’s why Ohio State was still ranked ahead of Purdue that year Purdue beat them by 30. Take a non homer stance, please. I just wanna see if you’re capable of doing it.
You're getting as tiresome as El Jexan with that "homerism" crap you pull every time you see someone's comments that you disagree with. Jeez. Barry buried Tom Osborne's ass head to head and it didn't have anything to do with one program being on probation or down or whatever the excuse du jour may be. Barry just flat out coached him. Period. If that doesn't make him a better coach then beating someone simply doesn't count in your book. You hate OU; we get it. But you're about as credible on anything to do with Oklahoma as I am on anything to do with Oregon. I have my prejudices too. We all do. But in this case it's pretty obvious that anytime Switzer and Osborne lined up against each other it was going to be Switzer getting carried off on the shoulders of his players. It happened 12 times out of 17 games. But Osborne was a better coach. Sheesh.![]()
There has never been an Oklahoma fan that has taken a non homer stance. The entire resume is more important than H2H, always has been, always will be. LOL @ the notion that I hate Oklahoma. I don't at all, but Oklahoma fans are the biggest blind homers in the world, and they need to get called on their shit. Notice that Switzer's only votes are from OU fans. It's pathetic really that fans of such a storied program can't envision a world where one of their coaches might not have been as good as another team's coaches, and then the more retarded OU fans try to bring up NFL success.You're getting as tiresome as El Jexan with that "homerism" crap you pull every time you see someone's comments that you disagree with. Jeez. Barry buried Tom Osborne's ass head to head and it didn't have anything to do with one program being on probation or down or whatever the excuse du jour may be. Barry just flat out coached him. Period. If that doesn't make him a better coach then beating someone simply doesn't count in your book. You hate OU; we get it. But you're about as credible on anything to do with Oklahoma as I am on anything to do with Oregon. I have my prejudices too. We all do. But in this case it's pretty obvious that anytime Switzer and Osborne lined up against each other it was going to be Switzer getting carried off on the shoulders of his players. It happened 12 times out of 17 games. But Osborne was a better coach. Sheesh.![]()
Oooh. Getting a bit slippery there with your logic again. I'd never vote Bud Wilkinson or Barry Switzer the GOAT. So there goes your little theory out the window. But apparently I've watched a lot more football than you have and I've learned that winning trumps everything especially when I see it happen over 70% of the time. You keep talking about H2H doesn't mean anything. LMAO And which coach had the higher winning percentage in his entire career? Barry Switzer.There has never been an Oklahoma fan that has taken a non homer stance. The entire resume is more important than H2H, always has been, always will be. LOL @ the notion that I hate Oklahoma. I don't at all, but Oklahoma fans are the biggest blind homers in the world, and they need to get called on their shit. Notice that Switzer's only votes are from OU fans. It's pathetic really that fans of such a storied program can't envision a world where one of their coaches might not have been as good as another team's coaches, and then the more retarded OU fans try to bring up NFL success.
There has never been an Oklahoma fan that has taken a non homer stance. The entire resume is more important than H2H, always has been, always will be. LOL @ the notion that I hate Oklahoma. I don't at all, but Oklahoma fans are the biggest blind homers in the world, and they need to get called on their shit. Notice that Switzer's only votes are from OU fans. It's pathetic really that fans of such a storied program can't envision a world where one of their coaches might not have been as good as another team's coaches, and then the more retarded OU fans try to bring up NFL success.
The fact that you even understand why Switzer is losing and blaming "Oklahoma haters" is laughable, and purely homeristic. Head to head matters, sure, but it doesn't trump overall resume, never has, never will, and coaches that own other coaches don't lose 3 in a row to said coach at any point.Oooh. Getting a bit slippery there with your logic again. I'd never vote Bud Wilkinson or Barry Switzer the GOAT. So there goes your little theory out the window. But apparently I've watched a lot more football than you have and I've learned that winning trumps everything especially when I see it happen over 70% of the time. You keep talking about H2H doesn't mean anything. LMAO And which coach had the higher winning percentage in his entire career? Barry Switzer.
Use words. Gifs are the tool of the idiot homer.
Its hard to ignore that fact that Osborne didn't start winning shit until after the King was gone.**notice that OU fans are STILL only grasping at the H2H lmao.
I guess if it's all you got.
The fact that you even understand why Switzer is losing and blaming "Oklahoma haters" is laughable, and purely homeristic. Head to head matters, sure, but it doesn't trump overall resume, never has, never will, and coaches that own other coaches don't lose 3 in a row to said coach at any point.
Use words. Gifs are the tool of the idiot homer.
Sure, except that's just dumb. TO had a record of 147-34-2 during that time and had 6 conference titles during Switzers time at OU and still competed for multiple national titles during that time. Including the 1983 team that is deemed as one of the best to not win a title #RealMenGoFor2.Its hard to ignore that fact that Osborne didn't start winning shit until after the King was gone.
I guess we will just have to settle this on the field this year.![]()