As an example, I took what
@beardown07 said about that psyche doctor yesterday and I started to look into it for myself. I asked him what more info he could give me. I took what
@broncosmitty had posted about it and added what I had found about it. I didn’t just dismiss it. I didn’t say “fuck that! It doesn’t fit my narrative”. I looked into it. I’m STILL looking into it. There’s clearly a lot there. I wanna know. I’ll take my time and look at it.
However, I’ve shared my initial thoughts about it. I’m still open to what it’s about but to me, at this time, it looks like Ruby was setting up an insanity defense. That’s generally why psych doctors are brought in. That’s sorta why he was brought into the Patty Hearst case… to talk about her state of mind at the time she committed crimes.
Conspiracy proponents will question why he was brought in on the Ruby case. That’s certainly fair and appropriate. I’d agree with that inquiry. My question is then if he was brought in to make Ruby “go crazy” so he wouldn’t talk then why did they (the CIA) wait YEARS to do it? Why did they chance that Ruby would “spill the beans” all those years? Isn’t that a legitimate question too? Does that make me anti-conspiracy? I don’t think so.